Response to Andrew Melbourne, "comment on: automated registration of sequential breath-hold dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images: a comparison of three techniques".

standard deformations. Any of these factors individually would seriously undermine the results of this work; combined together with the subsidiary points, the results and hence the conclusions of the article are invalidated. That being said, the contribution of the motion-free simulated data and the presentation of a new (applied to DCE-MRI) registration… CONTINUE READING