Response to `Comment on "Experimental demonstration of a universally valid error-disturbance uncertainty relation in spin measurements" '

@article{Erhart2012ResponseT,
  title={Response to `Comment on "Experimental demonstration of a universally valid error-disturbance uncertainty relation in spin measurements" '},
  author={Jacqueline Erhart and S. Sponar and Georg Sulyok and G. Badurek and M. Ozawa and Y. Hasegawa},
  journal={arXiv: Quantum Physics},
  year={2012}
}
  • Jacqueline Erhart, S. Sponar, +3 authors Y. Hasegawa
  • Published 2012
  • Physics, Mathematics
  • arXiv: Quantum Physics
  • Here, we reply to the comment by Y. Kurihara. We show that the argument by the author is on an improper basis and thus disagree with his opinion. 

    Figures from this paper.

    Error-Disturbance Trade-off in Sequential Quantum Measurements.
    • 5
    • PDF
    Error-disturbance uncertainty relations in neutron spin measurements
    Measurement Uncertainty: Reply to Critics
    • 9
    • PDF
    Fe b 20 14 Measurement Uncertainty : Reply to Critics
    Universally valid Heisenberg uncertainty relation
    • 23
    • PDF

    References

    Publications referenced by this paper.
    SHOWING 1-10 OF 42 REFERENCES
    Beating the quantum limits (cont'd)
    • 13
    Physical content of Heisenberg's uncertainty relation: limitation and reformulation
    • 67
    • PDF
    Measuring measurement–disturbance relationships with weak values
    • 57
    • PDF
    Universally valid reformulation of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle on noise and disturbance in measurement
    • 267
    • Highly Influential
    • PDF
    Quantum limits of measurements and uncertainty principle
    • 25
    • PDF
    Universal uncertainty principle in the measurement operator formalism
    • 36
    • PDF