Response of tomato cultivars to salinity

Abstract

The responses of five tomato cultivars (L. esculentum Mill) of different degrees of salt tolerance were examined over a range of 0 to 140 mM NaCl applied for 3 and 10 weeks. Judged by both Na and Cl accumulations and maintenance of K, Ca and Mg contents with increasing salinity, the most tolerant cultivars (Pera and GC-72) showed different responses. The greater salt tolerance of cv Pera was associated with a higher Cl and Na accumulation and a lower K content in the shoot than those found in the other cultivars, typical of a halophytic response to salinity. However, the greater salt tolerance of cv GC-72 was associated with a retention of Na and Cl in the root, restriction of their translocation to the shoot and maintenance of potassium selectivity under saline conditions. The salt tolerance mechanisms that operated in the remaining cultivars were similar to that of cv GC-72, as at first they excluded Na and Cl from the shoots, accumulating them in the roots; with longer treatment, the ability to regulate Na and Cl concentrations in the plant was lost only in the most salt sensitive cultivar (Volgogradskij), resulting in a massive influx of both ions into the shoot. The salt sensitivity of some tomato cultivars to salinity could be due to both the toxic effect of Na and Cl ions and nutritional imbalance induced by salinity, as plant growth was inversely correlated with Na and Cl contents and directly correlated with K and Ca contents. This study displays that there is not a single salt tolerance mechanism, since different physiological responses among tomato cultivars have been found.

DOI: 10.1007/BF00013017

5 Figures and Tables

Statistics

0204060'04'06'08'10'12'14'16
Citations per Year

101 Citations

Semantic Scholar estimates that this publication has 101 citations based on the available data.

See our FAQ for additional information.

Cite this paper

@article{Alfocea2004ResponseOT, title={Response of tomato cultivars to salinity}, author={F. Perez Alfocea and Maria T. Esta{\~n} and Manuel Caro and Maria C. Bolar{\'i}n}, journal={Plant and Soil}, year={2004}, volume={150}, pages={203-211} }