Response by Oreskes to “Beyond Counting Climate Consensus”

  title={Response by Oreskes to “Beyond Counting Climate Consensus”},
  author={Naomi Oreskes},
  journal={Environmental Communication},
  pages={731 - 732}
  • N. Oreskes
  • Published 28 September 2017
  • Psychology
  • Environmental Communication
Pearce et al. (2017) raise a number of important points regarding the relation of expert knowledge, consensus, and public engagement on controversial issues. I entirely agree with them that mobiliz... 
A Reply to Cook and Oreskes on Climate Science Consensus Messaging
In their replies to our paper (Pearce et al., 2017), both Cook (2017) and Oreskes (2017) agree with our central point: that deliberating and mobilizing policy responses to climate change requires t...
Feyerabend and manufactured disagreement: reflections on expertise, consensus, and science policy
This paper reconstructs and assess Feyerabend’s conception of disagreement, with a particular emphasis on the role of experts, and its role in the formation of science policy.
Creative (Climate) Communications
Conversations about climate change at the science-policy interface and in our lives have been stuck for some time. This handbook integrates lessons from the social sciences and humanities to more
In Defense of “Targeting” Some Dissent about Science
In a recent article in this journal—“Who’s Afraid of Dissent?”—Immaculada de Melo-Martín and Kristen Intemann argue that “targeting” dissent about science that is perceived to be problematic is both
Why do we argue about science? Exploring the psychological antecedents of rejection of science
Science is recognised and accepted as an important tool for understanding the world in which we live, yet some people hold beliefs that go against the best available scientific evidence. For example,
How We Know What We Know
  • S. Crawford
  • Physics
    Creative (Climate) Communications
  • 2019
Steve Crawford explains how astronomers use spectroscopy to unlock the secrets of the Universe.
Search for Meaning
  • J. R. Royce
  • Philosophy
    Creative (Climate) Communications
  • 2019
insistent quest for the meaning of things. The question is one that faces "everyman" from the child's first awareness of the mystery of life to the adult's apprehension of the mystery of death. As
Academic Climate Advocacy and Activism
  • Education
    Creative (Climate) Communications
  • 2019
Do the Right Thing
  • C. Gant
  • Art
    Creative (Climate) Communications
  • 2019


Beyond Counting Climate Consensus
ABSTRACT Several studies have been using quantified consensus within climate science as an argument to foster climate policy. Recent efforts to communicate such scientific consensus attained a high
About “scientific consensus on climate change”
I ’m writing this personal opinion about a “hot” topic: the Antropogenic Global Warming (AGW) consensus. In EPN 44/6, John Cook presents the conclusions of a paper by himself et al., published in
Doubt Is Their Product: How Industry’s Assault on Science Threatens Your Health
  • S. Gilbert
  • Political Science
    Environmental Health Perspectives
  • 2009
The author describes the efforts of the tobacco industry to obscure the scientific evidence for the adverse health effects of their products while increasing sales by manipulating nicotine levels and by advertising to young people.
The Cigarette Century: The Rise, Fall, and Deadly Persistence of the Product That Defined America
In the 20th century, 100 million people died from tobacco-related deaths, and it is projected that 1 billion people will die from the same cause in the 21st century.
How Well Do Facts Travel?: My Facts Are Better Than Your Facts: Spreading Good News about Global Warming
  • N. Oreskes
  • Political Science, Environmental Science
  • 2010
Introduction In the late 1980s, planning began for what would become the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development in Rio de Janeiro, known informally as the Earth Summit. Scientists
tobacco smoke to global warming
  • 2014
The Collapse Of Western Civilization
How well do facts travel? (pp. 135–166)
  • 2010