Resource Curse or Rentier Peace? The Ambiguous Effects of Oil Wealth and Oil Dependence on Violent Conflict

@article{Basedau2009ResourceCO,
  title={Resource Curse or Rentier Peace? The Ambiguous Effects of Oil Wealth and Oil Dependence on Violent Conflict},
  author={Matthias Basedau and Jann Lay},
  journal={Journal of Peace Research},
  year={2009},
  volume={46},
  pages={757 - 776}
}
  • M. Basedau, J. Lay
  • Published 23 September 2009
  • Political Science, Economics
  • Journal of Peace Research
The ‘resource curse’ hypothesis claims that abundance in natural resources, particularly oil, encourages especially civil war. Natural resources provide both motive and opportunity for conflict and create indirect institutional and economic causes of instability. Contrarily, the theory of the rentier state — largely neglected in the study of peace and war in this respect — suggests that regimes use revenue from abundant resources to buy off peace through patronage, large-scale distributive… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

Rethinking the Conflict “Resource Curse”: How Oil Wealth Prevents Center-Seeking Civil Wars
Abstract A broad literature on how oil wealth affects civil war onset argues that oil production engenders violent contests to capture a valuable prize from vulnerable governments. By contrast,
Natural Resources, Weak State and Civil War: Can Rents Help Coup Prone Regimes?
New discoveries of oil and gas are projected to occur in poor countries with weak governance and political institutions. Are such countries at an increased risk of civil war? We argue that regime
Natural Resources, Weak States and Civil War: Can Rents Stabilize Coup Prone Regimes?
This paper argues that state weakness is broader than implied previously in the civil war literature, and that particular types of weakness in interaction with natural resources have aggravating or
Oil and the ‘new wars’: another look at the resource curse using alternative data
The thesis that natural resources cause conflict is criticized on the basis that resource dependence and conflict are caused by other underlying factors and that the relationship is endogenous. Using
Oil, relative strength and civil war mediation
Civil conflicts within oil-rich states tend to last longer but are less likely to be mediated and end in a peace agreement. This implies that oil-funded conflict is less likely to end through a
Avoiding Turmoil: A Comparative Exploration of the ‘Resource Curse’
As petroleum extraction and consumption has steadily increased in recent decades, economists and development researchers have been puzzled by discrepancies in the growth, development, and governance
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 32 REFERENCES
Buying Peace? Oil Wealth, Corruption and Civil War, 1985—99
This article argues that, contrary to received wisdom, political corruption is not necessarily associated with a higher risk of civil war in oil-rich states. Political corruption can be used to
Resource Rents, Governance, and Conflict
Case studies as well as cross-country studies suggest that countries with an abundance of natural resources are more prone to violent conflict. This collection of articles analyzes the link between
Buying peace or fuelling war: the role of corruption in armed conflicts
Although corruption may have a corrosive effect on economies and rule-based institutions, it also forms part of the fabric of social and political relationships. This endogenous character means that
No Representation without Taxation? Rents, Development, and Democracy
Natural resource windfalls would seem to be a boon for poor countries. They reduce the burden of taxation, create a middle class, and pay for social services. In the view of most scholars, however,
Diamonds, Blood, and Taxes
This article addresses an important gap in research on the causes of civil war: the lack of a theory that explains why lootable resources like alluvial diamonds are linked to civil war in some cases
RETHINKING THE RESOURCE CURSE: Ownership Structure, Institutional Capacity, and Domestic Constraints*
▪ Abstract Most political scientists and economists unequivocally accept the proposition that abundant mineral resources are more often a curse than a blessing, particularly for developing countries.
Primary Commodity Exports and Civil War
Collier and Hoeffler reported that countries with a higher percentage of national income from primary commodity exports have been more prone to civil war, an interesting finding that has received
A Closer Look at Oil, Diamonds, and Civil War
▪ Abstract Studies of natural resource wealth and civil war have been hampered by measurement error, endogeneity, lack of robustness, and uncertainty about causal mechanisms. This paper develops new
Paradise is a Bazaar? Greed, Creed, and Governance in Civil War, 1989-99
Some prominent recent studies of civil war argue that greed, not grievance, is the primary motivating factor behind violence, basing their conclusions on a strong empirical association between
...
...