Research waste is still a scandal—an essay by Paul Glasziou and Iain Chalmers

  title={Research waste is still a scandal—an essay by Paul Glasziou and Iain Chalmers},
  author={Paul P. Glasziou and Iain Chalmers},
  journal={British Medical Journal},
Progress has been made towards reducing the 85% of wasted effort in medical research—and the huge amounts of money misspent and harm caused to patients—but there’s still a long way to go, say Paul Glasziou and Iain Chalmers 
Research waste is still a scandal—especially in medical students
No group is more susceptible to producing poor quality research than medical students, and in the US, more medical students pursue research to improve job prospects than in the UK.
Things can only get better
  • R. Dean
  • Psychology
    Veterinary Record
  • 2019
Research waste reduces the usefulness of research in veterinary science and Rachel Dean describes the problem and suggests a way to increase the use of research results by practitioners.
Avoidable research waste in dermatology: what is the problem?
  • H. Williams
  • Medicine, Psychology
    The British journal of dermatology
  • 2022
This editorial documents some examples of avoidable research waste in dermatology and a view on why it occurs.
Evidence synthesis for tackling research waste
There is an immediate need for a change in research workflows so that pre-existing knowledge is better used in designing new research. A formal assessment of the accumulated knowledge prior to
Research wastage: industry versus academic sponsorship
The commentary by Glasziou and Chalmers1 raises many issues2 that need tackling to prevent the effects of poor and wasted research on patient safety and medical training, as well as the colossal
Reduce, reuse, recycle: good stewardship of research data
Reuse of data addresses the issue that sometimes researchers can use their data again, and reduces is used to designate making one’s data available for use in secondary analysis, individual patient data meta-analysis, reanalysis, or for any other valid scientific purpose.
Pesquisar para quê?
In this editorial, measures for authors to ensure the impact of their research are introduced, and new editorial policies from RBMFC are introduced.
Efficient accumulation of scientific knowledge, research waste and accumulation bias
Accumulation bias asks for new statistical methods to limit incorrect decisions from health research while avoiding research waste, and efficient accumulation of scientific knowledge research waste and accumulation bias is asked for.
Existing indicators to measure the biomedical innovation ecosystem: A targeted landscape review for FasterCures
This working paper describes a targeted landscape review conducted in order to assess evidence in the existing literature regarding the characterisation and measurement of the biomedical innovation
Examining the role of funders in ensuring value and reducing waste in research: An organizational case-study of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
Findings indicate PCORI has undertaken efforts to align its funding practices with international recommendations to ensure the value of public dollars invested in research.


Towards evidence based research
To avoid waste of research, no new studies should be done without a systematic review of existing evidence, argue Hans Lund and colleagues
The scandal of poor medical research
The authors need less research, better research, and research done for the right reasons, and researchers who use the wrong techniques, use the right techniques wrongly, misinterpret their results, report their results selectively, cite the literature selectively, and draw unjustified conclusions.
Four principles to make evidence synthesis more useful for policy
Reward the creation of analyses for policymakers that are inclusive, rigorous, transparent and accessible, urge Christl A. Donnelly and colleagues.Reward the creation of analyses for policymakers
Evidence based medicine manifesto for better healthcare
A response to systematic bias, wastage, error, and fraud in research underpinning patient care and its implications for clinical practice.
Drug development: Raise standards for preclinical cancer research
C. Glenn Begley and Lee M. Ellis propose how methods, publications and incentives must change if patients are to benefit.
Twenty top papers to mark The BMJ’s two digital decades
  • D. Payne
  • Medicine
    BMJ : British Medical Journal
  • 2015
To mark the 20th anniversary of The BMJ ’s website, the journal asked 20 UK and international readers, authors, friends, and former colleagues to name an outstanding article published since the mid-1990s and why, according to their chosen readers, they are the best.
Improving the quality of reporting in randomised controlled trials.
The CONSORT tool was developed to help achieve improvements in the design and reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and to adhere more closely to current methodological standards in terms of conduct and reporting.
A history of the evolution of guidelines for reporting medical research: the long road to the EQUATOR Network
Testing medical treatments and other interventions aimed at improving people’s health is incredibly important. However, comparative studies need to be well designed, well conducted, appropriately