Research on Scientific Journals: Implications for Editors and Authors

@inproceedings{Armstrong1982ResearchOS,
  title={Research on Scientific Journals: Implications for Editors and Authors},
  author={J. Armstrong},
  year={1982}
}
A review of editorial policies of leading journals and of research relevant to scientific journals revealed conflicts between 'science' and 'scientists.” Owing to these conflicts, papers are often weak on objectivity and replicability. Furthermore, papers often fall short on importance, competence, intelligibility, or efficiency. Suggestions were made for editorial policies such as: (1) structured guidelines for referees, (2) open peer review, (3) blind reviews, and (4) full disclosure of data… Expand
Barriers to Scientific Contributions: The Author's Formula
Writing publishable papers.
Quality and Peer Review of Research: An Adjudicating Role for Editors
  • D. Newton
  • Psychology, Medicine
  • Accountability in research
  • 2010
...
1
2
3
4
5
...