Reproducible Research is like riding a bike

@article{Granell2018ReproducibleRI,
  title={Reproducible Research is like riding a bike},
  author={Carlos Granell and Daniel N{\"u}st and Frank O. Ostermann and Rusne Sileryte},
  journal={PeerJ Prepr.},
  year={2018},
  volume={6},
  pages={e27216}
}
Reproducibility is a fundamental pillar in science but it has recently been described as hard and challenging to achieve, as stated in numerous editorials and papers, some of which alert on a “reproducibility crisis”. In this article we outline 1/ the approach taken to put Reproducible Research (RR) in the agenda of the GIScience community, 2/ first actions and initial lessons learned towards the discussion and adoption of RR principles and practices in the workflows and habits of researchers… 

Figures from this paper

Reproducibilidad en AGILE: experiencias, logros y recomendaciones Reproducibility in AGILE: experiences, achievements, and recommendations

TLDR
A call to the Latin American GIScience community to consider the resources detailed here in order to encourage reproducible research in their scientific communities.

Reproducible Publications at AGILE conferences : Proposed guidelines for authors

TLDR
The development of publication guidelines needs to address a series of questions like how reviewers can be rewarded for their efforts to assess the reproducibility or what a reasonable balance is between being specific in the guidelines.

Reproducibility and Replicability in the Context of the Contested Identities of Geography

This article situates the current discussion of reproducibility and replicability taking place across the sciences within geographers’ enduring discussion of nomothetic and idiographic approaches,

Reproducibilidad científica: ¿Qué es y por qué debemos interesarnos en geo-ciencias?

A pesar de que en los últimos tiempos se ha resaltado la importancia de la reproducibilidad como pilar del proceso científico, en las geo-ciencias ésta no ha sido reconocida como una preocupación

Leveraging Container Technologies in a GIScience Project: A Perspective from Open Reproducible Research

TLDR
Enterprise containerisation technologies proved to enhance the reproducibility of a GIScience project and UML diagrams were used to describe representative work-flows deployed in the project.

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 24 REFERENCES

Digital open science—Teaching digital tools for reproducible and transparent research

TLDR
An introductory course that guides students towards a reproducible science workflow and outline the course content and possible extensions, report encountered challenges, and discuss how to integrate such a course in existing curricula.

Reproducible research and GIScience: an evaluation using AGILE conference papers

TLDR
To support researchers in producing reproducible work, the GIScience conference series could offer awards and paper badges, provide author guidelines for computational research, and publish articles in Open Access formats.

Computational reproducibility in geoscientific papers: Insights from a series of studies with geoscientists and a reproduction study

TLDR
Advice is proposed for authors to overcome the issues around reproducibility in the computational geosciences using the R code.

Data Sharing by Scientists: Practices and Perceptions

TLDR
Large scale programs, such as the NSF-sponsored DataNET will both bring attention and resources to the issue and make it easier for scientists to apply sound data management principles.

Opening GIScience: A process-based approach

TLDR
It is argued that a process-based approach focusing on how analysis is opened throughout the research process provides a supplementary way to define and reflect upon public facing geographic research.

Reproducible and reusable research: are journal data sharing policies meeting the mark?

TLDR
It is confirmed that only a minority of biomedical journals require data sharing, and a significant association between higher Impact Factors and journals with a data sharing requirement is found, and most data sharing policies did not provide specific guidance on the practices that ensure data is maximally available and reusable.

The possibility and desirability of replication in the humanities

In this article, we argue that the debate on the poor reproducibility of scientific research has overlooked an entire field: replication is also possible and desirable in the humanities. So far, the

Changes in Data Sharing and Data Reuse Practices and Perceptions among Scientists Worldwide

TLDR
Results point to increased acceptance of and willingness to engage in data sharing, as well as an increase in actual data sharing behaviors, while an examination of subject disciplines shows that the constraints and enablers of data sharing and reuse manifest differently across disciplines.

Prepublication disclosure of scientific results: Norms, competition, and commercial orientation

TLDR
The extent to which scientists disclose prepublication results, and when they do, why is examined, and a probability model shows that 70% of field variation in disclosure is related to differences in respondent beliefs about norms, competition, and commercialization.

Data sharing and the future of science

  • Computer Science
    Nature Communications
  • 2018
TLDR
Evidence shows that studies based on analyses of previously published data can achieve just as much impact as original projects, as data sharing today enables new science tomorrow.