Reporting of methods was better in the Clinical Trials Registry-India than in Indian journal publications.

@article{Tharyan2013ReportingOM,
  title={Reporting of methods was better in the Clinical Trials Registry-India than in Indian journal publications.},
  author={Prathap Tharyan and Aneesh Thomas George and Richard Kirubakaran and Jabez Paul Barnabas},
  journal={Journal of clinical epidemiology},
  year={2013},
  volume={66 1},
  pages={10-22}
}
OBJECTIVE We sought to evaluate if editorial policies and the reporting quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) had improved since our 2004-05 survey of 151 RCTs in 65 Indian journals, and to compare reporting quality of protocols in the Clinical Trials Registry-India (CTRI). STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING An observational study of endorsement of Consolidated Standards for the Reporting of Trials (CONSORT) and International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) requirements in the… CONTINUE READING