Reply to comment on “measures of variability for geological data” by D. F. Watson and G. M. Philip

@article{Watson1990ReplyTC,
  title={Reply to comment on “measures of variability for geological data” by D. F. Watson and G. M. Philip},
  author={D. F. Watson},
  journal={Mathematical Geology},
  year={1990},
  volume={22},
  pages={227-231}
}
  • D. F. Watson
  • Published 1990
  • Philosophy
  • Mathematical Geology
    • Commentaire a l'article de Watson D. F. et Philip G. M., 1989 «Measures of variatibility for geological data», Math. Geol. v 21 p 253-254 et reponse des auteurs 
    View on Springer
    12 Citations
    Highly Influential Citations
    1
    Background Citations
    2
    Methods Citations
    1
    12 Citations
    Citation Type

    Citation Type

    Quantitative analysis of detrital modes: statistically rigorous confidence regions in ternary diagrams and their use in sedimentary petrology
    • 164
    Principles of compositional data analysis
    • 57
    SPATIAL PREDICTION OF SOIL PARTICLE-SIZE FRACTIONS AS COMPOSITIONAL DATA
    • 62
    • PDF
    Mapping soil particle-size fractions: A comparison of compositional kriging and log-ratio kriging
    • 16
    The single principle of compositional data analysis, continuing fallacies, confusionsand misunderstandings and some suggested remedies
    • 25
    On criteria for measures of compositional difference
    • 186
    Compositional Data Analysis: Where Are We and Where Should We Be Heading?
    • 284
    • PDF
    The mathematics of compositional analysis
    • 46
    • PDF
    Fundamentación matemática del análisis estadístico de datos composicionales
    • 1
    • Highly Influenced
    • PDF
    Reply to Letter to the Editor by S. Rehder and U. Zier
    • 5