Reply to Klocksiem on the Counterfactual Comparative Account of Harm

@article{Carlson2020ReplyTK,
  title={Reply to Klocksiem on the Counterfactual Comparative Account of Harm},
  author={Erik Carlson},
  journal={Ethical Theory and Moral Practice},
  year={2020},
  pages={1-7}
}
  • Erik Carlson
  • Published 2020
  • Economics
  • Ethical Theory and Moral Practice
In a recent article in this journal, I claimed that the widely held counterfactual comparative account of harm (CCA) violates two very plausible principles about harm and prudential reasons. Justin Klocksiem argues, in a reply, that CCA is in fact compatible with these principles. In this rejoinder, I shall try to show that Klocksiem’s defense of CCA fails. 

References

SHOWING 1-9 OF 9 REFERENCES