Reply to Enberg and Jørgensen: Ecology and evolution both matter for explaining stock dynamics.

@article{Eikeset2017ReplyTE,
  title={Reply to Enberg and J\orgensen: Ecology and evolution both matter for explaining stock dynamics.},
  author={Anne Maria Eikeset and Erin S. Dunlop and Mikko Heino and Geir Olve Storvik and Nils Chr. Stenseth and Ulf Dieckmann},
  journal={Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America},
  year={2017},
  volume={114 22},
  pages={E4322-E4323}
}
Enberg and Jørgensen (1) state that the “conclusion that fishing-induced evolution is negligible follows from model assumptions”. First, it goes without saying that results of model-based studies all follow from model assumptions. Second, we conclude that evolution has not been negligible (2). In fact, fisheries-induced evolution appears to have been… CONTINUE READING