Reply to Comments

@article{Sripada2013ReplyTC,
  title={Reply to Comments},
  author={Chandra Sekhar Sripada and Peter Railton and Roy F. Baumeister and M. Seligman},
  journal={Perspectives on Psychological Science},
  year={2013},
  volume={8},
  pages={151 - 154}
}
Evidence of prospective processes is increasingly common in psychological research, which suggests the fruitfulness of a theoretical framework for mind and brain built around future orientation. No metaphysics of determinism or indeterminism is presupposed by this framework, nor do considerations of scientific method require determinism—successful scientific theories in the natural sciences all involve probabilistic elements. We speculate that expressive behavior and moral decision making use… 
The Science of Morality and its Normative Implications
Neuromoral theorists are those who claim that a scientific understanding of moral judgment through the methods of psychology, neuroscience and related disciplines can have normative implications and
Causality in Philosophy; Philosophy in Psychology
This chapter of the book on philosophy deals with philosophy, in general, as it relates to psychology, and also it deals more specifically with key topics in philosophy in relation to causality and
Creative Genius as Causal Agent in History: William James's 1880 Theory Revisited and Revitalized
Near the onset of his illustrious career, the psychologist William James proposed a theory of how individual genius can exert a unique and enduring causal impact on the history of civilization. After
A Natural Science of Behavior
TLDR
The argument here is that psychology as a science cannot survive other than as ascience of behavior, and the selection of behavior by its consequences is a central component of a science of behavior.
New Foundations for Imperative Logic: Pure Imperative Inference
TLDR
It is argued that there are two kinds of bindingness, and that a vacillation between two corresponding variants ofbindingness-validity largely explains conflicting intuitions concerning the validity of some pure imperative arguments.
Debating the BVSR Theory of Creativity: Comments on Dasgupta (2011) and Gabora (2011)
Donald Campbell's blind variation and selective retention (BVSR) theory of creativity is now more than a half-century old, but it continues to provoke debate, both in his original version and in the
Power, Soft or Deep? An Attempt at Constructive Criticism
This paper discusses and criticizes Joseph Nye’s account of soft power. First, we set the stage and make some general remarks about the notion of social power. In the main part of this paper we offer
Evaluating Interests in Social Science: Beyond Objectivist Evaluation and the Non-judgemental Stance
This article attempts to move debates about interests beyond the impasse between proponents of objective evaluation and defenders of a non-judgemental approach to lay actors’ interests. It develops
Kant and the Pleasure of “Mere Reflection”
Abstract In the Critique of the Power of Judgment, Kant refers to the pleasure that we feel when judging that an object is beautiful as the pleasure of “mere reflection”. Yet Kant never makes
Skinner's Walden Two: An Anticipation of Positive Psychology?
B. F. Skinner's, 1948 novel, Walden Two has some remarkable parallels to the growing Positive Psychology movement which emphasizes the promotion of subjective well being, the development of character
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 28 REFERENCES
Prospection by Any Other Name? A Response to Seligman et al. (2013)
TLDR
It is argued that future-oriented cognition is fully consistent with deterministic accounts of cognition, including automaticity, and that prospection does little to advance the position of free will.
The emperor's new mind - concerning computers, minds and the laws of physics
Abstract The emperor's new mind (hereafter Emperor) is an attempt to put forward a scientific alternative to the viewpoint of “strong AI,” according to which mental activity is merely the acting out
Navigating Into the Future or Driven by the Past
TLDR
The history of the attempt to cast teleology out of science is reviewed, culminating in the failures of behaviorism and psychoanalysis to account adequately for action without teleology.
Who accepts Savage's axiom?
Many decision theorists believe that the axioms of rational choice are similar to the principles of logic in the sense that no reasonable person who understands them would wish to violate them. The
A Neural Substrate of Prediction and Reward
TLDR
Findings in this work indicate that dopaminergic neurons in the primate whose fluctuating output apparently signals changes or errors in the predictions of future salient and rewarding events can be understood through quantitative theories of adaptive optimizing control.
How the Self Controls Its Brain
TLDR
This chapter discusses dualist-interactionism, the search for the self and its brain, and the evolution of Complexity of the Brain with the Emergence of Consciousness.
Thinking, Fast and Slow
Daniel Kahneman, recipient of the Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences for his seminal work in psychology challenging the rational model of judgment and decision making, is one of the world's most
Value, pleasure and choice in the ventral prefrontal cortex
...
...