Reply to Comment on ‘Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature’

@article{Cook2013ReplyTC,
  title={Reply to Comment on ‘Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature’},
  author={John Cook and Kevin D Cowtan},
  journal={Environmental Research Letters},
  year={2013},
  volume={10}
}
  • J. Cook, K. Cowtan
  • Published 1 June 2013
  • Environmental Science
  • Environmental Research Letters
We analyze the evolution of the scientific consensus on anthropogenic global warming (AGW) in the peer-reviewed scientific literature, examining 11 944 climate abstracts from 1991‐2011 matching the topics ‘global climate change’ or ‘global warming’. We find that 66.4% of abstracts expressed no position on AGW, 32.6% endorsed AGW, 0.7% rejected AGW and 0.3% were uncertain about the cause of global warming. Among abstracts expressing a position on AGW, 97.1% endorsed the consensus position that… 

Consensus on consensus: a synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused global warming

The consensus that humans are causing recent global warming is shared by 90%–100% of publishing climate scientists according to six independent studies by co-authors of this paper. Those results are

Comment on ‘Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature’

Cook et al’s highly influential consensus study (2013 Environ. Res. Lett. 8 024024) finds different results than previous studies in the consensus literature. It omits tests for systematic

Comment on ‘Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature’

I read the study by Cook et al with great interest [1]. The study used levels of endorsement of global warming as outlined in their table 2; however, I could see nomention as to how these levels were

The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong?

In 1995, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change announced that anthropogenic climate change had become discernible. Since then, numerous independent studies have affirmed that anthropogenic

The climate change consensus extends beyond climate scientists

The existence of anthropogenic climate change remains a public controversy despite the consensus among climate scientists. The controversy may be fed by the existence of scientists from other

History and future of the scientific consensus on anthropogenic global warming

The article by Cook et al offers an interesting new methodological approach to the debate about (supposedly lacking) scientific consensus on global warming, showing that contrarian claims that there

Divergent Perspectives on Expert Disagreement: Preliminary Evidence from Climate Science, Climate Policy, Astrophysics, and Public Opinion

ABSTRACT We report the results of an exploratory study that examines the judgments of climate scientists, climate policy experts, astrophysicists, and non-experts (N = 3367) about the factors that

Sources of doubt: actors, forums, and language of climate change skepticism

TLDR
The paper investigates the reference corpus of a climate change contrarian report and categorized the journal abstracts according to the endorsement positions on anthropogenic climate change, and showed moderate differences in the endorsement rates as well as in the sources of contrarian arguments considering the contrarians report in general and the presented journals specifically.
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 39 REFERENCES

About “scientific consensus on climate change”

I ’m writing this personal opinion about a “hot” topic: the Antropogenic Global Warming (AGW) consensus. In EPN 44/6, John Cook presents the conclusions of a paper by himself et al., published in

Scientific Consensus on Climate Change?

Fear of anthropogenic “global warming” can adversely affect patients' well-being. Accordingly, the state of the scientific consensus about climate change was studied by a review of the 539 papers on

Examining the Scientific Consensus on Climate Change

Fifty-two percent of Americans think most climate scientists agree that the Earth has been warming in recent years, and 47% think climate scientists agree (i.e., that there is a scientific consensus)

Expert credibility in climate change

TLDR
An extensive dataset of 1,372 climate researchers and their publication and citation data is used to show that 97–98% of the climate researchers most actively publishing in the field surveyed here support the tenets of ACC outlined by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

The scientific consensus of climate change revisited

The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change

Policy-makers and the public who are not members of the relevant research community have had to form opinions about the reality of global climate change on the basis of often conflicting descriptions

The Polls—Trends Twenty Years of Public Opinion about Global Warming

Over the past 20 years, there have been dozens of news organization, academic, and nonpartisan public opinion surveys on global warming, yet there exists no authoritative summary of their collective

Climate change 1995: the science of climate change.

This extensive report entitled “Climate Change 1995: The Science of Climate Change” is the most comprehensive and up-to-date assessment available for scientific understanding of human influences on

The pivotal role of perceived scientific consensus in acceptance of science

Public concern about anthropogenic global warming has been declining despite the scientific consensus on the issue. It is still unknown whether experts’ consensus determines people’s beliefs, and it