Religious experience and the probability of theism: comments on Swinburne

@article{Jger2017ReligiousEA,
  title={Religious experience and the probability of theism: comments on Swinburne},
  author={Christoph J{\"a}ger},
  journal={Religious Studies},
  year={2017},
  volume={53},
  pages={353 - 370}
}
  • C. Jäger
  • Published 10 August 2017
  • Philosophy
  • Religious Studies
Abstract I discuss the role of religious experience in Richard Swinburne's probabilistic case for theism. Swinburne draws on his principle of credulity to argue that, if in addition to other evidence we consider that many people have theistic religious experiences, theism comes out as more probable than not. However, on many plausible probability assignments for the relevant non-experiential evidence, the conditional probability of theism already converges towards 1. Moreover, an argument… 
2 Citations
Spiritual desire and religious practice
Abstract This article clarifies the relationship between spiritual desire and religious practice. I outline a philosophical account of practice, and suggest that desire is one of four cornerstones of
Argumente für die Existenz Gottes: Struktur und Anliegen
  • W. Löffler
  • Philosophy
    Handbuch Analytische Religionsphilosophie
  • 2019
Bestandteil vieler (keineswegs: aller) religioser Uberzeugungssysteme ist die Uberzeugung von der Existenz (zumindest) eines personenahnlichen, korperlosen, zeitlich anfangs- und endlosen,

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 39 REFERENCES
The Principle of Credulity and Religious Experience
In The Existence of God Richard Swinburne argues that certain religious experiences support the hypothesis that God exists. Indeed, the argument from religious experience is of crucial importance in
Liberalism and Conservatism in the Epistemology of Perceptual Belief
Liberals claim that some perceptual experiences give us immediate justification for certain perceptual beliefs. Conservatives claim that the justification that perceptual experiences give us for
Swinburne on credal belief
Richard Swinburne devotes much of his book Faith and Reason 1 to determining the standard of propositional belief required for belief in a religious creed. 2 As the book demonstrates, a key issue in
In defence of dogmatism
  • Luca Moretti
  • Philosophy
    Canadian Medical Association journal
  • 1969
TLDR
The answer turns on whether or not the Bayesian can determine the priors of hypotheses and conjectures on the grounds of their extra-empirical virtues and the thesis that dogmatism has an antisceptical bite is probably false.
Believing God: an account of faith as personal trust
Abstract The affective view of faith, as opposed to the doxastic or cognitive view, giving more importance to goodwill than to belief content, has received much support in recent philosophy of
WHAT SWINBURNE SHOULD HAVE CONCLUDED
In The Existence of God, Richard Swinburne presents a detailed examination of the various arguments for and against God's existence. Methodologically, Swinburne's approach is to develop a cumulative
On having no reason: dogmatism and Bayesian confirmation
TLDR
This paper argues using Keynes’ and Knight’s distinction between risk and uncertainty that the Bayesian principle fails to accommodate the intuitive notion of having no reason to believe.
Skepticism and the Vagaries of Justified Belief
NYU 1. The famous skeptical argument Descartes gives in his First Meditation goes something like this: " Among the things I'm most confident about is that there is a red coffee mug on the computer
Problems for Dogmatism
I argue that its appearing to you that P does not provide justification for believing that P unless you have independent justification for the denial of skeptical alternatives – hypotheses
Problems for Credulism
I’ve defended views about the epistemology of perception that I call “dogmatist.” They are close to views defended by Michael Huemer and John Pollock, and somewhat more broadly to a range of views
...
1
2
3
4
...