Reliability of the AO/ASIF classification for pertrochanteric femoral fractures

@article{Schipper2001ReliabilityOT,
  title={Reliability of the AO/ASIF classification for pertrochanteric femoral fractures},
  author={I. Schipper and E. Steyerberg and R. Castelein and A. V. Vugt},
  journal={Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica},
  year={2001},
  volume={72},
  pages={36 - 41}
}
20 radiographs of pertrochanteric femoral fractures were classified as to fracture "group" and "subgroup" according to the AO/ASIF Fracture Classification (type 31A) by 15 observers. 3 months later, the same radiographs were reviewed by the same observers. Mean agreement of the observers with the final consensus ranged from 53% (with subgroup classification) to 81% (without subgroup). The mean kappa value for interobserver reliability was 0.33 and 0.34 for classification with subgroup in both… Expand
View on Taylor & Francis
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
83 Citations
Highly Influential Citations
2
Background Citations
19
Methods Citations
1
Results Citations
1

83 Citations

Citation Type

Citation Type

Classification of trochanteric fracture of the proximal femur: a study of the reliability of current systems.
  • 112
The comparison of two classifications for trochanteric femur fractures: the AO/ASIF classification and the Jensen classification.
  • 57
Reliability of classification systems for intertrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur in experienced orthopaedic surgeons.
  • 78
Evaluation of the reproducibility of the Tronzo classification for intertrochanteric fractures of the femur☆☆☆
  • 2
Reliability of commonly used classification systems of trochanteric fractures of the proximal femur and evaluation of CT in improving the interobserver agreement
  • Dr Mihir Thanvi, Dr Anil Kumar Gupta, +4 authors C. Sharma
  • 2014
  • 1
  • PDF
valuation of the reproducibility of the Tronzo lassification for intertrochanteric fractures of the emur
  • PDF
The new AO classification system for intertrochanteric fractures allows better agreement than the original AO classification. An inter- and intra-observer agreement evaluation.
  • 1
Classifying Intertrochanteric Fractures of the Proximal Femur: Does Experience Matter?
  • 32
Inter and intra-observer agreement evaluation of the AO and the Tronzo classification systems of fractures of the trochanteric area.
  • 10
Inter- and Intraobserver Reliability for AO / ASIF and Moore Classification of Tibial Plateau Fractures - A Retrospective Study
  • 1
  • PDF
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 12 REFERENCES
The reproducibility of classification of fractures of the proximal end of the humerus.
  • 376
Interobserver variation using the AO/ASIF classification of long bone fractures.
  • 55
Assessment of the AO/ASIF fracture classification for the distal tibia.
  • 125
Effects of binary decision making on the classification of fractures of the ankle.
  • 25
Interobserver reliability in the Gustilo and Anderson classification of open fractures.
  • 80
Consistency of AO fracture classification for the distal radius.
  • 215
  • PDF
A critical assessment of factors influencing reliability in the classification of fractures, using fractures of the tibial plafond as a model.
  • 66
Observer variation in the radiographic classification of ankle fractures.
  • 155
Acceptable values of kappa for comparison of two groups.
  • 144
An Introduction to the Bootstrap
  • 16,508
  • PDF
...
1
2
...