Reliability of editors' subjective quality ratings of peer reviews of manuscripts.

Abstract

CONTEXT Quality of reviewers is crucial to journal quality, but there are usually too many for editors to know them all personally. A reliable method of rating them (for education and monitoring) is needed. OBJECTIVE Whether editors' quality ratings of peer reviewers are reliable and how they compare with other performance measures. DESIGN A 3.5-year… (More)

Topics

  • Blog articles referencing this paper

  • Presentations referencing similar topics