Reliability of Protocol Reviews for Animal Research

@article{Plous2001ReliabilityOP,
  title={Reliability of Protocol Reviews for Animal Research},
  author={S. Plous and H. Herzog},
  journal={Science},
  year={2001},
  volume={293},
  pages={608 - 609}
}
A random sample of 50 Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees (IACUCs) participated in a study of the protocol review process. Each committee submitted three animal behavior protocols it had recently reviewed, and these protocols were reviewed a second time by another participating committee. The results reported in this Policy Forum showed low levels of reliability in protocol judgments within and between committees. In addition, a majority of approved research protocols were… Expand
52 Citations

Topics from this paper

Analysis of Animal Research Ethics Committee Membership at American Institutions
The role of the animal ethics committee in achieving humane animal experimentation
Animal Ethical Evaluation: An Observational Study of Canadian IACUCs
Institution animal care and use committees need greater ethical diversity
  • L. Hansen
  • Psychology, Medicine
  • Journal of Medical Ethics
  • 2012
The Interpretation and Application of the Three Rs by Animal Ethics Committee Members
i The institutional review board is an impediment to human research: the result is more animal-based research
  • M. J. Rice
  • Medicine
  • Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM
  • 2011
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 10 REFERENCES
Developing standards in animal research review.
  • R. Dresser
  • Psychology, Medicine
  • Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association
  • 1989
ON THE METHODS AND THEORY OF RELIABILITY
Dale for their research assistance, D. Cicchetti for statistical consultation, and G. Borkowski for advice on survey design. Supported by NSF grant SBR-9616801
  • www.sciencemag.org SCIENCE VOL
  • 2001