Reliability and validity of 2 single-item measures of psychosocial stress.


BACKGROUND Practical limitations in epidemiologic research may necessitate use of only a few questions for assessing the complex phenomenon called "stress." The objective of this study was to evaluate the measurement characteristics of 2 single-item measures on the amount of stress and the ability to handle stress. METHODS We selected 218 adults age 50 to 76 years living in western Washington state from a large prospective cohort study of lifestyle factors and cancer risk to evaluate the 3-month test-retest reliability and intermethod reliability of the stress questions. To assess the latter, we compared 2 single-item measures on stress with 3 more fully validated multi-item instruments on perceived stress, daily hassles, and life events, which assessed the same underlying constructs as the single-item measures. RESULTS The test-retest reliabilities for the single-item stress measures were good (kappa and intraclass correlations between 0.66 and 0.74). The intermethod reliabilities comparing the 2 single-item stress measures with 3 multi-item instruments were moderate (r = 0.31-0.46) and comparable to correlations observed among the 3 multi-item instruments (r = 0.25-0.47). CONCLUSIONS The 2 single-item stress measures are reliable at measuring stress with validity similar to longer questionnaires. Single-item measures offer a practical instrument for assessing stress in large prospective epidemiologic studies that lack space for longer instruments.

Citations per Year

165 Citations

Semantic Scholar estimates that this publication has 165 citations based on the available data.

See our FAQ for additional information.

Cite this paper

@article{Littman2006ReliabilityAV, title={Reliability and validity of 2 single-item measures of psychosocial stress.}, author={Alyson J. Littman and Emily White and Jessie A. Satia and Deborah J. Bowen and Alan Kristal}, journal={Epidemiology}, year={2006}, volume={17 4}, pages={398-403} }