Reliability and Validity Assessment

@inproceedings{Carmines1979ReliabilityAV,
  title={Reliability and Validity Assessment},
  author={E. Carmines and R. Zeller},
  year={1979}
}
Explains how social scientists can evaluate the reliability and validity of empirical measurements, discussing the three basic types of validity: criterion related, content, and construct. In addition, the paper shows how reliability is assessed by the retest method, alternative-forms procedure, split-halves approach, and internal consistency method. 
Reliability and validity in research.
  • P. Roberts, H. Priest
  • Psychology, Medicine
  • Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987)
  • 2006
This article examines reliability and validity as ways to demonstrate the rigour and trustworthiness of quantitative and qualitative research. The authors discuss the basic principles of reliabilityExpand
Internal consistency estimates of reliability
Reliability assessments are appropriate for each research instrument in a study. Measures of internal consistency are a popular set of assessments with Cronbach's alpha being the most favored. TwoExpand
Measurement Issues: Reliability and Validity
TLDR
The precision, replicability, sensitivity to change, and accuracy of measures should be assessed in health promotion evaluations, and instruments and measures with known reliability and validity should be used. Expand
REVIEW OF RELIABILITY AND FACTORS AFFECTING THE RELIABILITY
TLDR
A reliable and valid measure is required for measuring the abstract characteristics and the factors must be known and taken into account to construct a reliable scale. Expand
An Overview of Coefficient Alpha and a Reliability Matrix for Estimating Adequacy of Internal Consistency Coefficients with Psychological Research Measures
TLDR
Issues in reliability assessment that are often neglected in psychological research such as acceptable levels of internal consistency for research purposes, factors affecting the magnitude of coefficient alpha, and considerations for interpreting α within the research context are addressed. Expand
Calculating, Interpreting, And Reporting Cronbach’s Alpha Reliability Coefficient For Likert-Type Scales
The purpose of this paper is to show why single-item questions pertaining to a construct are not reliable and should not be used in drawing conclusions. By comparing the reliability of a summated,Expand
Reliability and validity in a nutshell.
TLDR
The different concepts of reliability and validity as they are related to measurement instruments in social science and health care and the extent to which they are reliable, valid and usable must be established. Expand
The impact of scale length on reliability and validity
The conventional wisdom in political science seems to hold that simply increasing the length of scales automatically increases their reliability and that validity supposedly increases merely as theExpand
The empirical assessment of construct validity
TLDR
An in-depth review of the different methods available for assessing the construct validity of measures used in empirical research drew upon empirical research in the operations management area of manufacturing flexibility. Expand
Content Validity Using a Mixed Methods Approach
TLDR
The argument presented is that content validity requires a mixed methods approach since data are developed through qualitative and quantitative methods that inform each other and provides feedback on the effectiveness of the ToS through a process of determining consensus. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...