Relevance of statistically significant differences between reconstruction algorithms

@article{Matej1996RelevanceOS,
  title={Relevance of statistically significant differences between reconstruction algorithms},
  author={Samuel Matej and S{\'e}rgio Shiguemi Furuie and Gabor T. Herman},
  journal={IEEE transactions on image processing : a publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society},
  year={1996},
  volume={5 3},
  pages={554-6}
}
When comparing reconstruction algorithms, differences in figures of performance merit that are too small to be of any practical relevance may still be statistically significant. We formalize the notion of "relevance" and propose an evaluation methodology in which statistical significance is retained for relevant improvements, but not for irrelevant ones. 

1 Figure or Table

Topics