Relevance of Communicative acts

@inproceedings{Rooy2001RelevanceOC,
  title={Relevance of Communicative acts},
  author={Robert van Rooy},
  year={2001}
}
Why do we speak? Because we want to influence each other’s behavior. The relevance of a speech act can measure its usefulness. In this paper I argue that (i) the relevance of a speech act depends on the ‘language game’ one is involved in; (ii) notions of relevance can be defined using decision, information and game theory, and can be used for linguistic applications; and (iii) the strategic considerations of participants in a conversation deserve our attention, especially when we consider mixed… CONTINUE READING

From This Paper

Topics from this paper.

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 22 references

Expected information as expected utility

J. M. Bernardo
Ann. Statist • 1979
View 4 Excerpts
Highly Influenced

Logic and Conversation

H. P. Grice
1975
View 2 Excerpts
Highly Influenced

The pragmatics of mention-some readings of questions

Rooy, R. van
Proceedings of IWCS-4, • 2001

The mathematical theory of communication. 1963.

M.D. computing : computers in medical practice • 1997
View 1 Excerpt

Algebra of elementary social acts

A. Merin
Foundations of Speech Act Theory, • 1994
View 2 Excerpts

Communication, correlated equilibria and incentive compatability

R. B. Myerson
Handbook of Game Theory, • 1994
View 1 Excerpt

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…