Relative adrenal insufficiency in patients with septic shock: comparison of low-dose and conventional corticotropin tests.


OBJECTIVE To compare a low-dose (1 microg) corticotropin stimulation test with the more standard (250 microg) test for the diagnosis of relative adrenal insufficiency. DESIGN Diagnostic study. SETTING Thirty-one-bed mixed medico-surgical department of intensive care. PATIENTS Forty-six consecutive patients with septic shock. INTERVENTIONS Corticotropin stimulation tests (low-dose test, 1 microg, and standard 250-microg test), performed consecutively at an interval >4 hrs. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS In each test, serum cortisol levels were measured before (T0) and 30 (T30), 60 (T60), and 90 (T90) mins after corticotropin injection. The maximal increase in cortisol (Deltamax) was calculated as the difference between T0 and the highest cortisol value at T30, T60, or T90 and considered as adequate if >9 microg/dL (250 nmol/L). Nonresponders to the low-dose test had a lower survival rate than responders to both tests (27 vs. 47%, p = .06; Kaplan Meier curves). Interestingly, nonresponders to high-dose test received hydrocortisone treatment and had a similar survival to responders. Multivariable logistic regression disclosed that the response to the combined low-dose test and high-dose test was an independent predictor of survival (odds ratio 28.91, 95% confidence interval 1.81-462.70, p = .017), whereas basal or maximal cortisol levels in both tests were not. CONCLUSIONS The low-dose test identified a subgroup of patients in septic shock with inadequate adrenal reserve who had a worse outcome and would have been missed by the high-dose test. These patients may also benefit from glucocorticoid replacement therapy.


Citations per Year

405 Citations

Semantic Scholar estimates that this publication has 405 citations based on the available data.

See our FAQ for additional information.

Cite this paper

@article{Siraux2005RelativeAI, title={Relative adrenal insufficiency in patients with septic shock: comparison of low-dose and conventional corticotropin tests.}, author={Val{\'e}rie Siraux and Daniel De Backer and Gangadhar Yalavatti and Christian M{\'e}lot and Christine Gervy and Jean Mockel and Jean-Louis Vincent}, journal={Critical care medicine}, year={2005}, volume={33 11}, pages={2479-86} }