Relations among the Implicit Association Test, Discriminatory Behavior, and Explicit Measures of Racial Attitudes

@article{McConnell2001RelationsAT,
  title={Relations among the Implicit Association Test, Discriminatory Behavior, and Explicit Measures of Racial Attitudes},
  author={Allen R. McConnell and Jill M. Leibold},
  journal={Journal of Experimental Social Psychology},
  year={2001},
  volume={37},
  pages={435-442}
}
Heretofore, no research has shown that meaningful variability on the Implicit Association Test (IAT) relates to intergroup discrimination or to explicit measures of prejudice. In the current study, White undergraduates interacted separately with White and Black experimenters, and their behavior during these social interactions was assessed by trained judges and by the experimenters themselves. The participants also completed explicit measures of racial prejudice and a race IAT. As predicted… 

Tables from this paper

INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS AND GROUP PROCESSES Implicit and Explicit Prejudice and Interracial Interaction

The present research examined how implicit racial associations and explicit racial attitudes of Whites relate to behaviors and impressions in interracial interactions. Specifically, the authors

Implicit and Explicit Attitudes and Interracial Interaction: The Moderating Role of Situationally Available Control Resources

The present research examined whether implicit and explicit racial attitudes predict interracial interaction behavior differently as a function of situationally available control resources.

Discrimination and the Implicit Association Test

Prejudice researchers have been criticized for failing to assess behaviors that reflect overtly hostile actions (i.e. racial animus; Arkes & Tetlock, 2004; Mackie & Smith, 1998). Two studies sought

Explicit and Implicit Racial Attitudes: A Test of their Convergent and Predictive Validity

Using data from national samples, we examine the convergent and predictive validity of explicit and implicit measures of racial prejudice. First, we show that explicit measures diverge from a measure

Black Americans' Implicit Racial Associations And Their Implications for Intergroup Judgment

Abstract Many—though not all—black Americans exhibit an implicit evaluative preference for whites relative to blacks (e.g., Livingston, 2002). Are such biases meaningfully related to blacks' explicit

BLACK AND WHITE: THE ROLE OF COLOR BIAS IN IMPLICIT RACE BIAS

Abstract Research using the Implicit Association Test (IAT) has consistently shown that White participants demonstrate an implicit preference for White, race–related stimuli over similar Black

Ironic Effects of Racial Bias During Interracial Interactions

TLDR
The hypothesis that Blacks perceive White interaction partners who are more racially biased more positively than less biased White partners is tested, primarily because the former group must make more of an effort to control racial bias than the latter.

(Close) distance makes the heart grow fonder:Improving implicit racial attitudes and interracial interactions through approach behaviors.

TLDR
Investigating the effect of approaching Blacks on implicit racial attitudes and immediacy behaviors demonstrated that approaching Blacks decreased participants' implicit racial prejudice and increased immediacy when interacting with a Black confederate.
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 47 REFERENCES

Evidence for racial prejudice at the implicit level and its relationship with questionnaire measures.

TLDR
The magnitude of this implicit prejudice effect correlated reliably with participants' scores on explicit racial attitude measures, indicating that people's spontaneous stereotypic associations are consistent with their more controlled responses.

Measuring the Automatic Components of Prejudice: Flexibility and Generality of the Implicit Association Test

The Implicit Association Test (IAT; Greenwald, McGhee, & Schwartz, 1998) provides a flexible measure of the automatic associations underlying implicit prejudice. Results of three experiments showed

An Individual Difference Measure of Motivation to Control Prejudiced Reactions

The present research examines the assertion that individuals differ in the extent to which they seek to control the expression of prejudice. The authors developed the Motivation to Control Prejudiced

Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: a bona fide pipeline?

TLDR
The research examines an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes based on the evaluations that are automatically activated from memory on the presentation of Black versus White faces and the status of the Modern Racism Scale (MRS).

Implicit social cognition: attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes.

TLDR
The present conclusion--that attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes have important implicit modes of operation--extends both the construct validity and predictive usefulness of these major theoretical constructs of social psychology.

Internal and external motivation to respond without prejudice

Empirical evidence is presented from 7 samples regarding the factor structure; reliability; and convergent, discriminant, and predictive validity of separate measures of internal and external

Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components.

University of Wisconsin--Madis on Three studies tested basic assumptions derived from a theoretical model based on the dissociation ofantomatic and controlled processes involved in prejudice. Study I

Attitudes Versus Actions: The Relationship of Verbal and Overt Behavioral Responses to Attitude Objects.

Gordon Allport (1954) has described the attitude concept as "the primary building stone in the edifice of social psychology [p. 45]," and the extensive attitude literature in the past 20 years