• DOI:10.1086/430377
• Corpus ID: 12589461

Relapse and acquired rifampin resistance in HIV-infected patients with tuberculosis treated with rifampin- or rifabutin-based regimens in New York City, 1997-2000.

@article{Li2005RelapseAA,
  title={Relapse and acquired rifampin resistance in HIV-infected patients with tuberculosis treated with rifampin- or rifabutin-based regimens in New York City, 1997-2000.},
  author={Jiehui Li and Sonal S. Munsiff and Cynthia R. Driver and Judith E. Sackoff},
  journal={Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America},
  year={2005},
  volume={41 1},
  pages={
          83-91
        }
}

• Jiehui Li, S. Munsiff, +1 author J. Sackoff
• Published 1 July 2005
• Medicine, Biology
• Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America

BACKGROUND
The relationship between rifamycin use and either relapse or treatment failure with acquired rifampin resistance (ARR) among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients with tuberculosis (TB) is not well understood.

METHODS
We conducted a retrospective cohort study of HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected persons with rifampin-susceptible TB, (1) to compare relapse rates, ARR, and treatment failure, according to HIV serostatus; and (2) to examine whether and how use of rifamycin was associated with clinical outcomes of interest among HIV-infected patients with TB.

RESULTS
HIV-infected patients were more likely to have ARR than were HIV-uninfected patients (0.9% vs. 0.1%; P = .007), and the association remained significant in multivariate analysis (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 5.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-21.5). Among HIV-infected patients with TB, none of 57 patients treated with rifabutin-based regimens alone had ARR, and only 1 of 395 patients treated with rifabutin given in combination with a rifampin-based regimen had ARR, whereas 6 of 355 patients treated with a rifampin-based regimen alone had relapse and ARR. HIV-infected patients treated with rifampin-based regimens alone had a higher risk for relapse and development of rifampin resistance if intermittent dosing of rifampin was started during the intensive phase of treatment, compared with patients who did not receive intermittent dosing (hazard ratio [HR] for relapse, 6.7 [95% CI, 1.1-40.1]; HR for ARR, 6.4 [95% CI, 1.1-38.4]). This association remained when confined to patients with a CD4+ T lymphocyte count of < 100 lymphocytes/mm3. Intermittent dosing started only after the intensive phase of treatment did not increase the risks of relapse and ARR among HIV-infected patients with TB.

CONCLUSION
The risk for ARR among HIV-infected persons with TB did not depend on the rifamycin used but, rather, on the rifampin dosing schedule in the intensive phase of treatment.