Reinflating the Semantic Approach

@article{French1999ReinflatingTS,
  title={Reinflating the Semantic Approach},
  author={Steven French and James Ladyman},
  journal={International Studies in The Philosophy of Science},
  year={1999},
  volume={13},
  pages={99-117}
}
  • S. FrenchJ. Ladyman
  • Published 1 July 1999
  • Philosophy
  • International Studies in The Philosophy of Science
Abstract The semantic, or model‐theoretic, approach to theories has recently come under criticism on two fronts: (i) it is claimed that it cannot account for the wide diversity of models employed in scientific practice—a claim which has led some to propose a “deflationary” account of models; (ii) it is further contended that the sense of “model” used by the approach differs from that given in model theory. Our aim in the present work is to articulate a possible response to these claims, drawing… 

To Save the Semantic View

Exegetical analysis is performed, which demonstrates that the source of the semantic view’s present-day woes lies in a subtle conflation contained in one seminal articulation of the view, van Fraassen's The Scientific Image, and it is argued that supplanting central aspects of that work with ideas from Suppes is the remedy needed to provide the semanticView with the necessary resources for becoming wholly defensible against its oppositions.

The Semantic or Model-Theoretic View of Theories and Scientific Realism

I consider recent treatment of the model-theoretic view, and find that although some of these accounts harbour the promise of realism, this promise is deceptive and of no help to the realist.

What’s Right with a Syntactic Approach to Theories and Models?

It is argued that syntactic and semantic approaches fare equally well when it comes to ease of application, accommodating the use of models in the sciences, and capturing the theory-observation relation.

What’s Right with a Syntactic Approach to Theories and Models?

It is argued that syntactic and semantic approaches fare equally well when it comes to ease of application, accommodating the use of models in the sciences, and capturing the theory-observation relation.

Identity conditions, idealisations and isomorphisms: a defence of the Semantic Approach

It is argued that the partial structures approach is capable of meeting this challenge of identity conditions for theories and some broader observations about the role of such formal accounts within the philosophy of science are concluded.

Identity conditions, idealisations and isomorphisms: a defence of the Semantic Approach

In this paper I begin with a recent challenge to the Semantic Approach and identify an underlying assumption, namely that identity conditions for theories should be provided. Drawing on previous

Anchoring fictional models

The term ‘model’ was originally imported into the philosophy of science from logic and meta-mathematics. In these fields, a model is an abstract structure that satisfies a formal language, typically

Defending the Semantic View: what it takes

In this paper, a modest version of the Semantic View is motivated as both tenable and potentially fruitful for philosophy of science. An analysis is proposed in which the Semantic View is

Realism about Structure: The Semantic View and Nonlinguistic Representations

The central concern of this article is whether the semantic approach has the resources to appropriately capture the core tenets of structural realism. Chakravartty (2001) has argued that a realist
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 34 REFERENCES

The Importance of Models in Theorizing: A Deflationary Semantic View

  • S. Downes
  • Computer Science
    PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association
  • 1992
A deflationary semantic view is proposed, which is simply that model construction is an important component of theorizing in science and is consistent with a naturalized approach to the philosophy of science.

AN UNREAL IMAGE*

  • J. Worrall
  • Computer Science
    The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
  • 1984

Pragmatic truth and approximation to truth

It is shown that the pragmatic conception of truth, at least in one of its possible interpretations, has also a mathematical formulation, similar in spirit to that given by Tarski to the classical correspondence conception.

Paul Thompson The Structure of Biological Theories. Albany: State University of New York Press1989. Pp. x + 148.1

  • J. Collier
  • Philosophy
    Canadian Journal of Philosophy
  • 1992
The main argument of this book is that the 'Received View' that biological theories are best conceived of as interpreted sets of axioms and derived theorems is inferior to a newer model-theoretic

Explaining Science: A Cognitive Approach

Debate over the nature of science has recently moved from the halls of academia into the public sphere, where it has taken shape as the "science wars." At issue is the question of whether scientific

On the Extension of Beth's Semantics of Physical Theories

A basic aim of E. Beth's work in philosophy of science was to explore the use of formal semantic methods in the analysis of physical theories. We hope to show that a general framework for Beth's

Models of Data

To provide complete mathematical flexibility, I shall speak of theories axiomatized within general set theory by defining an appropriate set-theoretical predicate (e.g., ‘is a group’) rather than of theoriesAxiomatization directly within first-order logic as a formal language.

The Structure of Scientific Theories.

A scientific theory consists of a symbolic framework containing laws and concepts that are derived by deductive reasoning from fundamental laws and primitive concepts, and complemented by the

The Semantic Approach to Scientific Theories

The purpose of this paper is not to be new or original, but to provide a concise exposition of a certain approach in philosophy of science, at the hands of a loosely associated group of contemporary