Regressive Judgment

  title={Regressive Judgment},
  author={Klaus Fiedler and Christian Unkelbach},
  journal={Current Directions in Psychological Science},
  pages={361 - 367}
In the context of research on human judgment, regression is commonly treated as an artifact or an unwanted consequence of ill-controlled research designs. We argue that this negative image is undeserved. Regression affords not only an enlightening statistical construct but also a theoretical construct that can inspire novel research. It offers alternative accounts for a variety of well-known judgment biases, and it has inspired novel predictions of previously unknown biases. While all judgments… 

Figures from this paper

Relevance insensitivity: A new look at some old biases

What Constitutes Strong Psychological Science? The (Neglected) Role of Diagnosticity and A Priori Theorizing

  • K. Fiedler
  • Psychology
    Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science
  • 2017
A Bayesian perspective on Ioannidis’s (2005) memorable statement that “Most Published Research Findings Are False” suggests a seemingly inescapable trade-off, within which exploratory phenomenon-driven research can play a similarly strong part as strict theory-testing science.

Self-enhancement diminished.

This work proposes 2 new measures to separate error from bias in the domain of personality judgment and performance, and estimates a defensible bias and an enhancement error from individuals' actual and perceived similarity with others.

Towards a Deeper Understanding of Impression Formation – New Insights Gained From a Cognitive-Ecological Perspective

This work addresses the issue of how an n-independent averaging rule can account for the data patterns obtained in both labs, and disentangling different influences of n on resulting impressions, namely varying baserates of positive and negative traits, different sampling procedures, and trait diagnosticity.

The Rationality of Illusory Correlation

When presented with 2 samples (a smaller sample from a Minority population and a larger sample from a Majority population), where some rare or frequent features occur at exactly the same rate in both

Overfulfilling the norm: The Better-Than-Average effect in judgments of attitudes

Abstract. This research extends the better-than-average (BTA) effect commonly observed in judgments of abilities and personality traits to the domain of attitudes. Participants reported their

Deep memory distortions

The reversed description-experience gap: Disentangling sources of presentation format effects in risky choice.

A novel conceptualization of multiple independent sources of bias that contribute to the description-experience gap are presented, namely sampling biases and task specific information asymmetry on the one hand, and regression to the mean effects in probability estimation on the other hand.

Why Does George Clooney Make Coffee Sexy? The Case for Attribute Conditioning

When a celebrity (e.g., George Clooney) endorses a brand (e.g., a coffee type), people’s assessment of this brand typically changes. We suggest that the mere repeated pairing of celebrities with



Toward a synthesis of cognitive biases: how noisy information processing can bias human decision making.

A single coherent framework is proposed to synthesize long-standing research on 8 seemingly unrelated cognitive decision-making biases and offers formal mathematical definitions of the biases and their underlying generative mechanism, which permits a consolidated analysis of how they are related.

Naive empiricism and dogmatism in confidence research: a critical examination of the hard-easy effect.

A quantitative review of studies with 2-alternative general knowledge items demonstrates that there is very little support for a cognitive-processing bias in these data and near elimination of the hard-easy effect when there is control for scale-end effects and linear dependency.

Confirmation, Disconfirmation, and Informa-tion in Hypothesis Testing

Strategies for hypothesis testing in scientific investigation and everyday reasoning have interested both psychologists and philosophers. A number of these scholars stress the importance of

Judgment Biases in a Simulated Classroom--A Cognitive-Environmental Approach

Biases in judgments and decision making that are commonly explained in terms of the judge's prior expectancies can originate in unbiased environmental learning. Applying a recently developed sampling

The auto-verification of social hypotheses: Stereotyping and the power of sample size.

In the literature on social hypothesis testing, the co-occurrence of 2 principles is often held responsible for hypothesis confirmation. The first is positive testing (e.g., looking for covert rather

On splitting and merging categories: A regression account of subadditivity

The findings from two experiments supported predictions derived from the regression account of frequency estimates for split and merged categories and theoretical implications for subadditive judgments (of frequency, probability, and/or value) are discussed.

Interpreting regression toward the mean in developmental research.

The fundamental nature of regression toward the mean is frequently misunderstood by developmental researchers. While errors of measurement are commonly assumed to be the sole source of regression

On a distinction between hypothetical constructs and intervening variables.

A distinction is made between two subclasses of intervening variables, or the authors prefer to say, between ‘intervening variables’ and ‘hypothetical constructs’ which they feel is fundamental but is currently being neglected.

Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises

Confirmation bias, as the term is typically used in the psychological literature, connotes the seeking or interpreting of evidence in ways that are partial to existing beliefs, expectations, or a