Regarding the "Hole Argument"

@article{Weatherall2014RegardingT,
  title={Regarding the "Hole Argument"},
  author={James Owen Weatherall},
  journal={arXiv: History and Philosophy of Physics},
  year={2014},
  pages={329-350}
}
  • James Owen Weatherall
  • Published 2014
  • Mathematics, Physics
  • arXiv: History and Philosophy of Physics
  • I argue that the Hole Argument is based on a misleading use of the mathematical formalism of general relativity. If one is attentive to mathematical practice, I will argue, the Hole Argument is blocked. 

    Citations

    Publications citing this paper.
    SHOWING 1-10 OF 40 CITATIONS

    Disregarding the 'Hole Argument'

    VIEW 6 EXCERPTS
    CITES BACKGROUND & METHODS
    HIGHLY INFLUENCED

    Regarding ‘Leibniz Equivalence’

    VIEW 3 EXCERPTS
    CITES BACKGROUND & METHODS

    Regarding the ‘Hole Argument’ and the ‘Problem of Time’

    VIEW 4 EXCERPTS
    CITES BACKGROUND & METHODS
    HIGHLY INFLUENCED

    The classical limit as an approximation

    VIEW 1 EXCERPT
    CITES METHODS

    Fifty Million Elvis Fans Can’t be Wrong

    VIEW 1 EXCERPT
    CITES BACKGROUND

    The Hole Argument Against Everything (uncut)

    VIEW 4 EXCERPTS
    CITES BACKGROUND
    HIGHLY INFLUENCED

    FILTER CITATIONS BY YEAR

    2014
    2020

    CITATION STATISTICS

    • 4 Highly Influenced Citations

    • Averaged 8 Citations per year from 2018 through 2020

    References

    Publications referenced by this paper.