Reform retractions to make them more transparent

  title={Reform retractions to make them more transparent},
  author={Quan-Hoang Vuong},
  • Q. Vuong
  • Published 1 June 2020
  • Education
  • Nature
The scientific community should agree on the essential information to be provided when pulling a paper from the scientific literature. The scientific community should agree on the essential information to be provided when pulling a paper from the scientific literature. 
The seventh bibliometric finding on deforestation and cultural studies
This short piece of communication has the sole purpose of identifying some evidence, supporting our view regarding a possible missing environment-nurturing cultural value. Here, we attempt to examine
The right to refuse unwanted citations: rethinking the culture of science around the citation
The right to refuse to be cited or to refuse a citation is discussed as valid and invalid literature increasingly gets mixed through citations, and as the grey zone between predatory/non-predatory and scholarly/unscholarly becomes increasingly difficult to distinguish.
Fortification of retraction notices to improve their transparency and usefulness
Retraction notices (RNs) are historical documents and must be as informative as possible to ensure the scholarly record is complete to ensure consistency and completeness.
Data frauds, health risks, and the growing question of ethics during the COVID-19 pandemic
In this essay, we advocate that the issue of health data ethics should no longer be considered on the level of individual scientists or research labs, but rather as a problem involving all
Writing a scientific article does not end with a description of the summarized results. Conclusions and implications remain a crucial part of the article. The previous papers portrayed the most
Total SciComm: A Strategy for Communicating Open Science
The paper uses an example of a debate surrounding a now-retracted article in the Nature journal, in which open data, preprints, social media, and blogs are being used for a meaningful scientific conversation.
Rethinking editorial management and productivity in the COVID-19 pandemic
The indirect costs of the COVID-19 pandemic, specifically extended work absenteeism and possible loss of productivity, are discussed focusing on the research community and its publishing We suggest
Do Legitimate Publishers Benefit or Profit from Error, Misconduct or Fraud?
One of the aspects of post-publication peer review that is difficult for reputable journals or publishers to accept is that it may reveal flaws in their oft-claimed resilient peer review and
Crossing the 100-publication milestone to celebrate the new year 2021
As the year 2021 has just begun, it is time for us to look back to see what we have achieved so far. Last year, the year of 2020, marked a special event for the Center for Interdisciplinary Social
Non‐author entities accountable for retractions: A diachronic and cross‐disciplinary exploration of reasons for retraction
Retraction notices are expected to be transparent about entities accountable for retractions and their reasons for retraction. No previous research on retraction notices has investigated accountable