Reflexivity, Contradiction, Paradox and M. C. Escher

@article{Goldstein1996ReflexivityCP,
  title={Reflexivity, Contradiction, Paradox and M. C. Escher},
  author={L. Goldstein},
  journal={Leonardo},
  year={1996},
  volume={29},
  pages={299 - 308}
}
  • L. Goldstein
  • Published 1996
  • Art
  • Leonardo
  • The paradoxes that have been studied by philosophers and logicians are arguments that lead from plausible premises to impossible conclusions. For example, in the Liar Paradox, the assumption that “This statement is false” is either true or false leads to the conclusion that it is both true and false. Depictions of sc-called “impossible objects” in the late works of M. C. Escher are visually paradoxical. There are deep similarities between visual and logico-semantic paradoxes. In the case of the… CONTINUE READING
    3 Citations

    References

    SHOWING 1-10 OF 42 REFERENCES
    Paradox without Self-Reference
    • 187
    • PDF
    Comparison of Russell's Resolution of the Semantical Antinomies with that of Tarski
    • A. Church
    • Mathematics, Computer Science
    • J. Symb. Log.
    • 1976
    • 92
    A Yabloesque paradox in set theory
    • 13
    Pointers to Truth
    • 71
    • PDF
    What Metaphors Mean
    • 804
    • PDF
    The visual mind: art and mathematics
    • 71
    Eye and Brain: The Psychology of Seeing
    • 894
    • PDF
    Gödel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid
    • 1,154