• Corpus ID: 15228099

Reflective Oracles: A Foundation for Classical Game Theory

@article{Fallenstein2015ReflectiveOA,
  title={Reflective Oracles: A Foundation for Classical Game Theory},
  author={Benja Fallenstein and Jessica Taylor and Paul Francis Christiano},
  journal={ArXiv},
  year={2015},
  volume={abs/1508.04145}
}

• Benja Fallenstein, Jessica Taylor, P. Christiano
• Published 17 August 2015
• Computer Science, Economics
• ArXiv

Classical game theory treats players as special---a description of a game contains a full, explicit enumeration of all players---even though in the real world, "players" are no more fundamentally special than rocks or clouds. It isn't trivial to find a decision-theoretic foundation for game theory in which an agent's coplayers are a non-distinguished part of the agent's environment. Attempts to model both players and the environment as Turing machines, for example, fail for standard diagonalization reasons.
In this paper, we introduce a "reflective" type of oracle, which is able to answer questions about the outputs of oracle machines with access to the same oracle. These oracles avoid diagonalization by answering some queries randomly. We show that machines with access to a reflective oracle can be used to define rational agents using causal decision theory. These agents model their environment as a probabilistic oracle machine, which may contain other agents as a non-distinguished part.
We show that if such agents interact, they will play a Nash equilibrium, with the randomization in mixed strategies coming from the randomization in the oracle's answers. This can be seen as providing a foundation for classical game theory in which players aren't special.