Reflective Argumentation: A Cognitive Function of Arguing

@article{Hoffmann2016ReflectiveAA,
  title={Reflective Argumentation: A Cognitive Function of Arguing},
  author={M. Hoffmann},
  journal={Argumentation},
  year={2016},
  volume={30},
  pages={365-397}
}
Why do we formulate arguments? Usually, things such as persuading opponents, finding consensus, and justifying knowledge are listed as functions of arguments. But arguments can also be used to stimulate reflection on one’s own reasoning. Since this cognitive function of arguments should be important to improve the quality of people’s arguments and reasoning, for learning processes, for coping with “wicked problems,” and for the resolution of conflicts, it deserves to be studied in its own right… Expand
Constructing Effective Arguments
Social actors make arguments for a range of purposes, such as to reflect on their own reasoning (Hoffmann 2016), to induce audiences to perform cognitive activities that may be precursors to beliefExpand
The Elusive Notion of “Argument Quality”
We all seem to have a sense of what good and bad arguments are, and there is a long history—focusing on fallacies—of trying to provide objective standards that would allow a clear separation of goodExpand
Stimulating Reflection and Self-correcting Reasoning Through Argument Mapping: Three Approaches
A large body of research in cognitive science differentiates human reasoning into two types: fast, intuitive, and emotional “System 1” thinking, and slower, more reflective “System 2” reasoning.Expand
Schemes, Critical Questions, and Complete Argument Evaluation
TLDR
This work combines a logical with a substantive approach to the argument schemes by starting from Toulmin’s schema: ‘data, warrant, so claim’, and forwards a meta-level CQ-list that is arguably both complete and applicable. Expand
Evaluating Arguments from a Play about Ethics in Science: A Study with Medical Learners
Developing critical thinking ability is one of the main goals of medical education, in part because it enhances clinical reasoning, a vital competence in clinical practice. However, there is limitedExpand
How a Critical Thinker Uses the Web
1 The web, or Worldwide Web as it was first known, is all of the services and content that a person can access using a web browser like Google Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer, Safari, or any of aExpand
The role of collaborative argumentation in future teachers' selection of online information
TLDR
Teachers should acquire skills in sourcing science-related information online, so they can use evidence appropriately in their pedagogical practice, according to a future generation of teachers. Expand
Développer les compétences argumentatives de lycéens par des débats numériques sur des Questions Socio-Scientifiques Vers une didactique de l'argumentation et de l'esprit critique
De nombreuses questions aujourd'hui cruciales pour le devenir de notre societe mettent en jeu les sciences et les technologies. Dans la perspective d'une education a la citoyennete, former lesExpand
‘I wouldn’t want to be the animal in use nor the patient in need’ – the role of issue familiarity in students’ socioscientific argumentation
ABSTRACT Students’ argumentation skills are considered a central tool to contribute to scientific controversies in the science classroom. Scientific controversies of social relevance (socioscientificExpand
Reflexivity in Jaeggi’s Critique of Forms of Life
<jats:p />

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 113 REFERENCES
The Epistemological Theory of Argument--How and Why?
The article outlines a general epistemological theory of argument: a theory that regards providingjustified belief as the principal aim of argumentation, and defends it instrumentalistically. AfterExpand
An Epistemological Approach to Argumentation
The evaluation of arguments and argumentation is best understood epistemologically. Epistemic circularity is not formally defective but it may be epistemologically objectionable. Sorenson's doubtsExpand
Arguing to learn and learning to argue: design justifications and guidelines
Meaningful learning requires deep engagement with ideas. Deep engagement is supported by the critical thinking skill of argumentation. Learning to argue represents an important way of thinking thatExpand
The Potential of Argument in Knowledge Building
It is a matter of quasi-consensus among argumentation researchers that engaging in argumentation sets the scene for changes in people’s views. However, the actual process by which such changes occurExpand
Argument and Its Uses
The chapter raises an alarm about the direction that theorizing seems to be taking. For understandable reasons there has been a focus on the persuasive use of arguments to such a degree that many nowExpand
Arguing to Learn in Science: The Role of Collaborative, Critical Discourse
TLDR
Recent research shows that opportunities for students to engage in collaborative discourse and argumentation offer a means of enhancing student conceptual understanding and students’ skills and capabilities with scientific reasoning. Expand
The Uses of Argument in Communicative Contexts
This paper challenges the view that arguments are (by definition, as it were) attempts to persuade or convince an audience to accept (or reject) a point of view by presenting reasons for (or against)Expand
The skills of argument
The Skills of Argument presents a comprehensive empirical study of informal reasoning as argument, involving subjects across the life span. Subjects ranging in age from adolescence to late adulthoodExpand
Thinking as Argument
In attempting to define intelligence in real-world contexts, psychologists have focused primarily on the kinds of thinking that people do in work-related environments. In this article, however,Expand
Argument and Its Uses (OSSA 2005 Keynote Address)
Do not define argument by its use to persuade. for other uses of arguments exist. An argument is a proposition and a reason for it. and argumentation is an interchange involving two or more partiesExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...