Reflections on my journey in using Information Technology to support Legal Decision Making—from Legal Positivism to Legal Realism

@article{Zeleznikow2019ReflectionsOM,
  title={Reflections on my journey in using Information Technology to support Legal Decision Making—from Legal Positivism to Legal Realism},
  author={John Zeleznikow},
  journal={Law in Context. A Socio-legal Journal},
  year={2019}
}
  • John Zeleznikow
  • Published 2019
  • Political Science
  • Law in Context. A Socio-legal Journal
In this paper I discuss my transition from legal positivism to legal realism and how this has impacted upon my construction of legal decision support systems. As a child living with parents who were heavily engaged in politics, and who had disastrous experiences with the twin evils of fascism and communism, I was encouraged to become a scientist. But my interest was always in law and politics. Constructing legal decision support systems was a pragmatic balance between my skills and interests… Expand

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 46 REFERENCES
An Australian Perspective on Research and Development Required for the Construction of Applied Legal Decision Support Systems
TLDR
This paper discusses the evolution of legal decision support systems, including the transition to hybrid rule-based/case-based systems, and how machine learning led to investigate the domains of explanation and argumentation. Expand
Rationales for the continued development of legal expert systems
his article looks at the development and enormous potential of legal expert systems and the problems which often arise due to a suspicious and ill-informed legal fraternity. As most lawyers findExpand
Supporting discretionary decision-making with information technology: a case study in the criminal sentencing jurisdiction
A number of increasingly sophisticated technologies are now being used to support complex decision-making in a range of contexts. This paper reports on a project undertaken to provide decisionExpand
Using Web-based Legal Decision Support Systems to Improve Access to Justice
TLDR
Tools for building web-based legal decision support systems are discussed and examples from the domains of Family Law and eligibility for legal aid are given to help litigants negotiate their disputes. Expand
Developing an Online Dispute Resolution Environment: Dialogue Tools and Negotiation Support Systems in a Three-Step Model
Although artificial intelligence (AI) is commonly associated with anthropomorphic computers performing amazing feats, as in movies like The Matrix and Minority Report, AI is actually a much broaderExpand
Modeling the Evolution of Legal Discretion - An Artificial Intelligence Approach
TLDR
The notion of legal or judicial discretion, and weaker and stronger forms of discretion, is examined, and three independent axes are observed: bounded and unbounded, defined and undefined, and binary and continuous are observed. Expand
Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement without Giving in
tips, and pitfalls to avoid that are presented in his book: "Amobilized and enabled middle management resource, which was likelyskipped over and avoided in the past. has been made capable of leadingExpand
The IKBALS project: Multi-modal reasoning in legal knowledge based systems
TLDR
The rule based part of the system which provides advice on the Credit Act has been commercially developed in conjunction with a legal firm and it is indicated how this work has lead to the development of a methodology for constructing rule based legal knowledge based systems. Expand
Legal Fairness in ADR Processes - Implications for Research and Teaching
One of the major concerns raised by people using negotiation processes is about the fairness or justice of the process. Individuals undertake negotiation to derive better outcomes than wouldExpand
A Strategy for Evaluating Web-Based Discretionary Decision Support Systems
TLDR
This framework frames an evaluation both in terms of the context of use of the system and the context of its evaluation and includes guidelines for the selection of appropriate evaluation criteria under differing contingencies. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...