• DOI:10.1017/S0008938900020562
• Corpus ID: 144087233

Reflections on an Old “New History” Quantitative Social Science History in Postmodern Middle Age

@article{Johnson1989ReflectionsOA,
  title={Reflections on an Old “New History” Quantitative Social Science History in Postmodern Middle Age},
  author={Eric Anthony Johnson},
  journal={Central European History},
  year={1989},
  volume={22},
  pages={408 - 426}
}

• E. Johnson
• Published 1 September 1989
• History
• Central European History

Not very long ago quantitative historians were on the offensive. Only a decade back the eminent “Annales School” French historian Emmanuel Le Roy Ladurie stated in the English language translation of a work he had published a decade earlier in his native language that “tomorrow's historian will have to be able to program a computer in order to survive,” and that “history that is not quantifiable cannot claim to be scientific.” In America, where even more champions of quantitative work resided, several new journals were founded in the 1970s such as the Journal of Interdisciplinary History, Historical Methods, and Social Science History which were explicitly devoted to new social scientific approaches to the study of history and above all to quantitative approaches. And even in Germany, which seemed the most immune to the quantitative contagion of all the major western lands, owing perhaps to its long entrenched historicist traditions and to its historians' preoccupations with the tragic happenings of its still recent past, the decade of the seventies saw the development of several new outlets for quantitative and social scientific historical research such as Geschichte und Gesellschaft and Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung. Hence to most professional historians, whether they liked it or not, quantitative history appeared to be the wave of the future, and ignoring the new possibilities offered by the computer appeared to risk being relegated to the proverbial dustbin.