Reflections on Scientific Misconduct in Management: Unfortunate Incidents or a Normative Crisis?

  title={Reflections on Scientific Misconduct in Management: Unfortunate Incidents or a Normative Crisis?},
  author={Benson Honig and Joseph Lampel and Joel A. C. Baum and Mary Ann Glynn and Runtian Jing and Michael Lounsbury and Elke Sch{\"u}ssler and David G. Sirmon and Anne S. Tsui and James P. Walsh and Arjen van Witteloostuijn},
  journal={Academy of Management Perspectives},
Taking as our starting point Merton’s (1942/1973) defense of science facing pressures from totalitarian regimes, we argue that today’s challenge to the integrity of management scholarship does not ... 

Tables from this paper

Critical essay: Blinding faith – Paradoxes and pathologies of opacity in peer review
The standing and progress of science depends upon confidence in the evaluation of knowledge claims. This essay affirms the value of peer review as a ‘gold standard’ but argues that its efficacy for...
Embracing Robustness and Reliability in the Science of Organizations
Together, these commentaries help researchers make contributions to improving every step of the research trajectory—theory development, methodology, and the process of quality control through peer review.
Identifying and Solving the Right Problem by Using Multidimensional Systems Thinking
To avoid substantive failures in problem solving business and management scholars should reconsider the basic assumptions of the system under their study and include as many stakeholders’ views as possible.
Self-criticisms toward a socially responsible science in the field of management
Management scholarship should be placed in a unique position to develop relevant scientific knowledge because business and management organizations are deeply involved in most global challenges.
Is Global Management Knowledge on the Way to Impoverishment?
This article seeks to synthesise three fields of inquiry – management studies, linguistics and cognitive psychology – to explore an arguably emerging phenomenon of global management knowledge (MK)
Reflections on Reflexive Theorizing: The Need for A Little More Conversation
We investigate the nature and impact of recent ‘reflexive theorizing’ in the field of Organization Studies by examining articles that critically reflect on research, practice and the profession more
When Shooting for the Stars Becomes Aiming for Asterisks: P-Hacking in Family Business Research
As a side-effect of increasing publication pressures, academics may be tempted to engage in p-hacking: a questionable research practice involving the iterative and incompletely-disclosed adjustment
Who Will it Take for Business to Improve Lives? The “Man” in the Mirror
  • J. Walsh
  • Art
    Humanistic Management Journal
  • 2019
What will it take for business to improve lives? Many think we need a theoretically sound meta-narrative to articulate the proper place for business in our lives. Important as that is, this
Enhancing Rigor in Quantitative Entrepreneurship Research
Reflecting on common empirical concerns in quantitative entrepreneurship research, recent calls for improved rigor and reproducibility in social science research, and recent methodological
Evolution of entrepreneurial teams in technology-based new ventures
The doctoral dissertation consists of one literature review and two empirical studies in the field of entrepreneurial teams in technology-based new ventures. The first chapter is a systematic


Management Science on the Credibility Bubble: Cardinal Sins and Various Misdemeanors
This research-based essay presents survey results—collected from faculty in 104 PhD-granting management departments of AACSB-accredited business schools in the United States—regarding 11 different ...
Special Section On Ethics in Management Research: Norms, Identity, and Community in the 21st Century
Growth in research on management has been accompanied by awareness of ethical problems that pose a serious threat to the integrity of our publication process, and the soundness of our knowledge bas...
Procedural Injustice in the System of Peer Review and Scientific Misconduct
Scientific misconduct, an alarming problem in the social and natural sciences, is rarely addressed through systematic research. Why do scholars do it? Using a group engagement model of procedural j...
Tent Poles, Tribalism, and Boundary Spanning: The Rigor-Relevance Debate in Management Research
An examination of the gap that exists between business scholars who are concerned with producing work that is rigorous and scholars that are more concerned with work that is relevant. The author no...
The Goals of Scholarship
This paper argues for the importance of discussion among management scholars about the goals of our scholarship and how it should be valued. Within the context of several identifiable pressures
Scholarly Impact: A Pluralist Conceptualization
We critically assess a common approach to scholarly impact that relies almost exclusively on a single stakeholder (i.e., other academics). We argue that this approach is narrow and insufficient, an...
Bad Management Theories Are Destroying Good Management Practices
This article argues that academic research related to the conduct of business and management has had some very significant and negative influences on the practice of management. These influences ha...
Is Science Value Free?: Values and Scientific Understanding
Exploring the role of values in scientific inquiry, Hugh Lacey examines the nature and meaning of values, and looks at challenges to the view, posed by postmodernists, feminists, radical ecologists,
Who, Me? An Inductive Study of Novice Experts in the Context of How Editors Come to Understand Theoretical Contribution
The social sciences, including management, are at a crossroads. Globally, scholars are increasingly pressured to publish in top journals, compelling editorial boards to recruit more individuals—inc...
Sociology of Science
The Social Process of Innovation.By M. J. Mulkay. Pp. 64. (Macmillan: London and Basingstoke, April 1972.) 60p.