• DOI:10.1126/science.aaq0216
• Corpus ID: 206664954

Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers

@article{Poore2018ReducingFE,
  title={Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers},
  author={J. Poore and Thomas Nemecek},
  journal={Science},
  year={2018},
  volume={360},
  pages={987 - 992}
}

• J. Poore, T. Nemecek
• Published 1 June 2018
• Medicine, Business
• Science

The global impacts of food production Food is produced and processed by millions of farmers and intermediaries globally, with substantial associated environmental costs. Given the heterogeneity of producers, what is the best way to reduce food's environmental impacts? Poore and Nemecek consolidated data on the multiple environmental impacts of ∼38,000 farms producing 40 different agricultural goods around the world in a meta-analysis comparing various types of food production systems. The environmental cost of producing the same goods can be highly variable. However, this heterogeneity creates opportunities to target the small numbers of producers that have the most impact. Science, this issue p. 987 Food producer heterogeneity on a global level creates mitigation opportunities with respect to environmental damage caused by food production. Food’s environmental impacts are created by millions of diverse producers. To identify solutions that are effective under this heterogeneity, we consolidated data covering five environmental indicators; 38,700 farms; and 1600 processors, packaging types, and retailers. Impact can vary 50-fold among producers of the same product, creating substantial mitigation opportunities. However, mitigation is complicated by trade-offs, multiple ways for producers to achieve low impacts, and interactions throughout the supply chain. Producers have limits on how far they can reduce impacts. Most strikingly, impacts of the lowest-impact animal products typically exceed those of vegetable substitutes, providing new evidence for the importance of dietary change. Cumulatively, our findings support an approach where producers monitor their own impacts, flexibly meet environmental targets by choosing from multiple practices, and communicate their impacts to consumers.