Corpus ID: 65537036

Redistricting: Drawing the Line

@article{Bangia2017RedistrictingDT,
  title={Redistricting: Drawing the Line},
  author={Sachet Bangia and C. Graves and Gregory Herschlag and H. S. Kang and J. Luo and Jonathan C. Mattingly and Robert J. Ravier},
  journal={arXiv: Applications},
  year={2017}
}
  • Sachet Bangia, C. Graves, +4 authors Robert J. Ravier
  • Published 2017
  • Mathematics, Computer Science
  • arXiv: Applications
  • We develop methods to evaluate whether a political districting accurately represents the will of the people. To explore and showcase our ideas, we concentrate on the congressional districts for the U.S. House of representatives and use the state of North Carolina and its redistrictings since the 2010 census. Using a Monte Carlo algorithm, we randomly generate over 24,000 redistrictings that are non-partisan and adhere to criteria from proposed legislation. Applying historical voting data to… CONTINUE READING
    Evaluating Partisan Gerrymandering in Wisconsin
    • 25
    • PDF
    A partisan districting protocol with provably nonpartisan outcomes
    • 12
    • PDF
    Complexity and Geometry of Sampling Connected Graph Partitions
    • 10
    • PDF
    A comparison of partisan-gerrymandering measures.
    • 4
    • PDF
    Fair redistricting is hard
    • 5
    • PDF
    A discrete districting plan
    • 2
    • PDF
    Mathematics of Nested Districts: The Case of Alaska
    • 3
    • PDF

    References

    Publications referenced by this paper.
    SHOWING 1-10 OF 21 REFERENCES
    An Optimization Based Heuristic for Political Districting
    • 238
    Unintentional Gerrymandering: Political Geography and Electoral Bias in Legislatures
    • 198
    • PDF
    A New Automated Redistricting Simulator Using Markov Chain
    • 39
    • Highly Influential
    • PDF
    Redistricting and the Will of the People
    • 22
    • PDF
    Assessing South Carolina's 1990s congressional districting
    • 66
    Computers in behavioral science. Legislative districting by computer simulation.
    • 33