Corpus ID: 63429313

Recursion in language : a critical discussion.

  title={Recursion in language : a critical discussion.},
  author={D. Cowie},
  • D. Cowie
  • Published 18 November 2015
  • Computer Science
This research draws on Chomsky and Everett's opposing views on the role of recursion in language. I will examine the role of recursion in sentences and investigate the hypothesis that it also plays an important role in the structuring of discourse, which would confirm the view that recursion is a fundamental feature of language. Table of 


Three reasons why the recursion-only hypothesis a cannot be correct are examined: recursion is neither unique to language in humans, nor unique to the authors' species, human language consists of many properties which are unique to it, and independent of recursion. Expand
Pirahã Culture and Grammar: A Response to Some Criticisms
This article responds to criticisms of the proposals of Everett 2005 by Nevins, Pesetsky, and Rodrigues (2009, this issue). It argues that their criticisms are unfounded and that Pirahã grammar andExpand
The evolution of the language faculty: Clarifications and implications
It is concluded that progress in understanding the evolution of language will require much more empirical research, grounded in modern comparative biology, more interdisciplinary collaboration, and much less of the adaptive storytelling and phylogenetic speculation that has traditionally characterized the field. Expand
Recursion: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?
This work states that there appear to be at least two common senses of recursion: embeddedness of phrases within other phrases, which entails keeping track of long-distance dependencies among phrases and the specification of the computed output string itself, including meta-recursion, where recursion is both the recipe for an utterance and the overarching process that creates and executes the recipes. Expand
A Syntactic Correlate of Semantic Asymmetries in Clausal Coordination
In the literature on the topic, it has generally been argued that the logical interpretation of and is semantically basic, and that asymmetric interpretations should be derived from this basicExpand
“A Running Back” and Forth: A Review of Recursion and Human Language
Contrary to a(n apparently) widespread belief, it is simply not true that recursive structures in languages “suggest recursive mechanisms in the grammar” (at least not in the sense that is usually intended in the literature — see infra). Expand
The Minimalist Program
In his foundational book, The Minimalist Program, published in 1995, Noam Chomsky offered a significant contribution to the generative tradition in linguistics. This twentieth-anniversary editionExpand
Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa Lectures
According to the above, the lender is usually empowered. Absorption download Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa Lectures (Studies in Generative Grammar [Sgg]) by Noam Chomsky pdf neutralizeExpand
The nature of the language faculty and its implications for evolution of language (Reply to Fitch, Hauser, and Chomsky)
In a continuation of the conversation with Fitch, Chomsky, and Hauser on the evolution of language, we examine their defense of the claim that the uniquely human, language-specific part of theExpand
The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?
We argue that an understanding of the faculty of language requires substantial interdisciplinary cooperation. We suggest how current developments in linguistics can be profitably wedded to work inExpand