Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes.

@article{Revicki2008RecommendedMF,
  title={Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes.},
  author={Dennis A. Revicki and R. Duane Hays and David Cella and Jeff A. Sloan},
  journal={Journal of clinical epidemiology},
  year={2008},
  volume={61 2},
  pages={102-9}
}
OBJECTIVE The objective of this review is to summarize recommendations on methods for evaluating responsiveness and minimal important difference (MID) for patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING We review, summarize, and integrate information on issues and methods for evaluating responsiveness and determining MID estimates for PRO measures. Recommendations are made on best-practice methods for evaluating responsiveness and MID. RESULTS The MID for a PRO instrument… CONTINUE READING
Highly Influential
This paper has highly influenced 65 other papers. REVIEW HIGHLY INFLUENTIAL CITATIONS

From This Paper

Topics from this paper.

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 460 extracted citations

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…