Recommendations Implicit in Policy Defaults

@article{Mckenzie2006RecommendationsII,
  title={Recommendations Implicit in Policy Defaults},
  author={Craig R. M. Mckenzie and Michael J. Liersch and Stacey R. Finkelstein},
  journal={Psychological Science},
  year={2006},
  volume={17},
  pages={414 - 420}
}
Should people be considered organ donors after their death unless they request not to be, or should they not be considered donors unless they request to be? Because people tend to stay with the default in a variety of domains, policymakers' choice of default has large and often important effects. In the United States, where the organ-donation policy default is “not a donor,” about 5,000 people die every year because there are too few donors. Four experiments examined two domains—being an organ… 

Tables from this paper

Does changing defaults save lives? Effects of presumed consent organ donation policies

Evidence indicates that rates of consent, donation, and transplantation are higher under presumed consent policies than under explicit consent policies, and policymakers must balance a number of other considerations to ensure that shifting to a presumed consent system will boost donation and transplation rates.

The meaning of default options for potential organ donors

Two other mechanisms—behavioral inertia and implicit norms—that are believed to underlie the default effect in decision making and other effects of policies designed to influence decision-makers are discussed.

The Ethics of Organ Donor Registration Policies: Nudges and Respect for Autonomy

While mandated active choice policies are not problem free—they are coercive, after all—voluntary active choice, opt-in, and opt-out policies are potentially less respectful of people's autonomy since their use of nudges could significantly affect people's decision making.

Nudging to donate organs: do what you like or like what we do?

It is argued that the as-judged-by-themselves principle may hold only in two of these cases and ways to expand nationwide surveys to identify the actual reasons for why defaults work are recommended.

Underlying Wishes and Nudged Choices

The practical issues that result from using default systems in the domain of organ donation are discussed and potential ways to ameliorate the uncertainty around inferences of underlying preference from a nudged choice are proposed.

Warning: You are about to be nudged

Presenting a default option is known to influence important decisions. That includes decisions regarding advance medical directives, documents people prepare to convey which medical treatments they

a publication of the behavioral science & policy association 35 Warning : You are about to be nudged

Presenting a default option is known to influence important decisions. That includes decisions regarding advance medical directives, documents people prepare to convey which medical treatments they

When should the Ask be a Nudge? The Effect of Default Amounts on Charitable Donations

How does setting a donation option as the default in a charitable appeal affect people's decisions? In eight studies, comprising 11,508 participants making 2,423 donation decisions in both

Legal origins, religion and health outcomes: a cross-country comparison of organ donation laws

Abstract This paper investigates what drives countries to legislate presumed consent – making citizens organ donors by default unless they opt out – instead of explicit consent. Results reveal the

Information Asymmetries in Default Options

Default options can convey information relevant to making a default decision. This paper documents a curious information asymmetry: Automatic enrollment defaults (where individuals opt-out of a
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 23 REFERENCES

Do Defaults Save Lives?

The article discusses how should policy-makers choose defaults regarding organ donors, noting that every policy must have a no-action default, and defaults impose physical, cognitive, and emotional costs on those who must change their status.

Who Are the Donors in Organ Donation? The Family's Perspective in Mandated Choice

The potential to eliminate the family's role in donation is the focus of efforts such as mandated choice for organ donation, which proposes to record the wishes of as many persons as possible about donation of their own organs and to retrieve this information in the event of death with donation potential.

Libertarian Paternalism is Not an Oxymoron

The idea of libertarian paternalism might seem to be an oxymoron, but it is both possible and legitimate for private and public institutions to affect behavior while also respecting freedom of

Regulation for Conservatives: Behavioral Economics and the Case for 'Asymmetric Paternalism'

Regulation by the state can take a variety of forms. Some regulations are aimed entirely at redistribution, such as when we tax the rich and give to the poor. Other regulations seek to counteract

What a speaker’s choice of frame reveals: Reference points, frame selection, and framing effects

The data suggest that frames reliably convey implicit information in addition to their explicit content, which helps explain why framing effects are so robust.

Framing effects in inference tasks—and why they are normatively defensible

In a reinterpretion of data published elsewhere, it is shown that some common effects in inference tasks (covariation assessment and hypothesis testing) can also be seen as framing effects, thereby expanding the domain of framing.

Framing, probability distortions, and insurance decisions

A series of studies examines whether certain biases in probability assessments and perceptions of loss, previously found in experimental studies, affect consumers' decisions about insurance. Framing

On site: to opt-in or opt-out?: it depends on the question

Results of experiments highlight the need for all online consumers to pay close attention to what they agree to when they send responses to a Web site, and the influence of question framing and response defaults on consumers' apparent privacy preferences.

Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model

Much experimental evidence indicates that choice depends on the status quo or reference level: changes of reference point often lead to reversals of preference. We present a reference-dependent