Reassessing the “Race to the Bottom” in State Welfare Policy

  title={Reassessing the “Race to the Bottom” in State Welfare Policy},
  author={William D. Berry and Richard C. Fording and Russell L. Hanson},
  journal={The Journal of Politics},
On the assumption that poor people migrate to obtain better welfare benefits, the magnet hypothesis predicts that a state's poverty rate increases when its welfare benefit rises faster than benefits in surrounding states. The benefit competition hypothesis proposes that states lower welfare benefits to avoid attracting the poor from neighboring states. Previous investigations, which yield support for these propositions, suffer from weaknesses in model specification and methodology. We correct… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

A Race to the Middle: The Politics of Interstate Cost Distribution and Welfare State Expansion

  • A. Walter
  • Economics
    The Journal of Politics
  • 2019
Previous research on welfare state development in federal states has claimed that interstate competition induces a race to the bottom with regard to social expenditure. While existing research has

The Impact of Welfare Programs on Poverty Rates: Evidence from the American States

There is spirited debate between those who maintain that public assistance to the poor decreases poverty by raising their incomes (an income enhancement effect) and those who contend that welfare

Inequality and Competition in State Redistributive Systems: Evidence From Welfare and Health

When determining their redistributive budgets, states must strike a subtle balance—to provide for their needy residents without becoming a “welfare magnet” and attracting poor individuals from

The Historical Impact of Welfare Programs on Poverty: Evidence from the American States

Over the years, there has been a spirited debate over the impact of the welfare expansion associated with the War on Poverty. Many analysts have maintained that public assistance expansion during

Outcomes and outputs: Long-term effects of Temporary Assistance for Needy Families on caseload enrollment and poverty

The Welfare Reform Legislation of 1996 is often cited as one of President Clinton’s most notable achievements, as this law was followed by sizable reductions in states’ welfare loads. Did this policy

Devolution in the U.S. Welfare Reform: Divergence and Degradation in State Benefits

The passage of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA) in 1996 devolved responsibility for the design of welfare programs from the federal to state governments in

Devolution and welfare reform: re-evaluating "success".

It is suggested that, under welfare reform, state and local governments are enacting diverse programs and do not appear to be limiting welfare provision in new ways to avoid becoming "welfare magnets," but the type of program they adopt is systematically related to the racial and ethnic composition of the caseloads and the local political climate, leading to a fragmentary system.

Was There a ‘Race to the Bottom’ After Welfare Reform?

Leading up to the passage of the 1996 welfare reform, there was much speculation and debate over the possibility that states would \race to the bottom" in setting welfare generosity if given more

Explaining the Survival of the Swedish Welfare State: Maintaining Political Support Through Incremental Change

Despite challenges and doomsday predictions, the Nordic welfare states with high taxes and public expenditure are still with us. This paper describes strategic choices for policy makers of the

Welfare Competition in Norway

Local redistribution policy creates incentives for welfare migration that may result in 'underprovision' or even a 'race to the bottom'. This paper evaluates the empirical importance of welfare



Welfare Magnets: Myth or Reality?

Since the passage of federal welfare reform in late 1996, 15 states have passed welfare residency requirements that restrict cash assistance to new migrants, an indication that welfare-induced

Resources Rather than Needs: A State-Centered Model of Welfare Policymaking

This study examines the states' policymaking for the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) program. It develops a public good model of welfare policymaking focused on changes in the maximum

Looking Inward, Looking Outward: The Politics of State Welfare Innovation under Devolution

Theories of federalism supporting the devolution of welfare policy to the states suggest that the removal of national policy controls will allow states to tailor-make welfare policy to fit local

Interstate Competition and Welfare Policy

In 1996, the federal government terminated the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) program and replaced it with the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program (TANF). Many powers once

American Federalism, Welfare Policy, and Residential Choices

The relationship between welfare benefit levels and the residential choices of the poor raises two issues for federalism in the United States. Do state benefit levels affect the residential choices

Without cause or effect: Reconsidering welfare migration as a policy problem

Theory: Stories of welfare migration are often statistical narratives of economic rationality that portray welfare migrants as engaging in economically rational but illegitimate behavior. Three waves

Do States Play Welfare Games

Abstract This paper uses a panel of state-level annual data from 1983 to 1994 for each of the contiguous United States and the District of Columbia, to explore the degree to which states

A Politico-Economic Theory of Income Redistribution

This study integrates models of income redistribution developed by economists, who suggest that citizens voluntarily redistribute because of interdependent preferences and rely on the state for

A Model of Welfare Competition with Evidence from AFDC

In this paper, we test empirically for strategic behaviour among the states using the cash support program Aid to Families with Dependant Children (AFDC). To motivate the empirical work, we adept