Reading Lies: Nonverbal Communication and Deception.

@article{Vrij2019ReadingLN,
  title={Reading Lies: Nonverbal Communication and Deception.},
  author={Aldert Vrij and Maria Hartwig and P{\"a}r Anders Granhag},
  journal={Annual review of psychology},
  year={2019},
  volume={70},
  pages={
          295-317
        }
}
The relationship between nonverbal communication and deception continues to attract much interest, but there are many misconceptions about it. In this review, we present a scientific view on this relationship. We describe theories explaining why liars would behave differently from truth tellers, followed by research on how liars actually behave and individuals' ability to detect lies. We show that the nonverbal cues to deceit discovered to date are faint and unreliable and that people are… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

Unraveling the Misconception About Deception and Nervous Behavior

The misconception about deception and nervous behavior is attempted, finding that lie tellers generally do not display more than truth tellers the nervous behaviors laypersons and professionals appear to focus on.

Misconceptions About Nonverbal Cues to Deception: A Covert Threat to the Justice System?

The dangers of misconceptions about nonverbal cues to deception during trials are highlighted and their popularity among justice and legal practitioners is addressed and, subsequently, their detrimental effect on the assessment of witness credibility is addressed.

True and False Intentions: A Mental Representational Approach

The study of true and false intentions is a specific case of deception-detection research. The focus is on how to discriminate between lies and truths about future behavior, as opposed to pre-vious

Research on Non-verbal Signs of Lies and Deceit: A Blind Alley

Research on the detection of lies and deceit has a prominent place in the field of psychology and law with a substantial research literature published in this field of inquiry during the last five to

Looks like a liar? Beliefs about native and non‐native speakers' deception

Funding information University of Ontario Institute of Technology , Grant/Award Number: SSHRC Small Research Grant (Internal) Summary We examined whether observers' beliefs about deception were

Do Lie Detection Tools Really Catch Liars?

Future efforts may be aimed at developing a tool that uses both verbal and nonverbal predictions to obtain greater accuracy in detecting lies than currently available methods.

The Analysis of Nonverbal Communication: The Dangers of Pseudoscience in Security and Justice Contexts

For security and justice professionals (e.g., police officers, lawyers, judges), the thousands of peer-reviewed articles on nonverbal communication represent important sources of knowledge. However,

The detection of deception during trials: Ignoring the nonverbal communication of witnesses is not the solution—A response to Vrij and Turgeon (2018)

In their paper ‘Evaluating credibility of witnesses—Are we instructing jurors on invalid factors?’, Vrij and Turgeon (2018) argue that jurors should be advised not to consider demeanour when trying
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 92 REFERENCES

Nonverbal indicators of deception: A new theoretical perspective

This study tested a theory of nonverbal behavior during deception. The theory is based on ability to monitor and ability to control nonverbal behaviors. The nonverbal behaviors of sixteen criminal

Verbal and nonverbal communication of deception

Nonverbal behavior and self-presentation.

The literatures on people's skills at using their nonverbal behaviors to feign internal states and to deceive are reviewed as they pertain to the question of whether people can overcome the many constraints on the translation of their intentions into expressions.

The Lying Chicken and the Gaze Avoidant Egg: Eye Contact, Deception, and Causal Order

People commonly believe that a link exists between perceptions of message veracity and nonverbal behaviors. Almost always, a specific causal order among the constructs is presumed. Nonverbal

Interviewing to detect deception

DePaulo et al.’s (2003) meta-analysis of verbal and nonverbal cues to deception showed that cues to deception are faint and unreliable. If liars do not spontaneously display diagnostic cues to

Cues to deception.

Results show that in some ways, liars are less forthcoming than truth tellers, and they tell less compelling tales, and their stories include fewer ordinary imperfections and unusual contents.

Behavioral Correlates of Deception in a Simulated Police Interview

Nonverbal indicators of deception in a simulated police interview were examined, particularly the relationship between arm and hand movements and deception, an area in which conflicting results have

Nonverbal Leakage and Clues to Deception †.

The study explores the interaction situation, and considers how within deception interactions differences in neuroanatomy and cultural influences combine to produce specific types of body movements and facial expressions which escape efforts to deceive and emerge as leakage or deception clues.

THE IMPACT OF DECEPTION AND SUSPICION ON DIFFERENT HAND MOVEMENTS

ABSTRACTThe present experiment examined the relationship between different types of discourse linked hand movements and deception. Hand gestures were experimentally studied during truth telling and

Saccadic eye movement rate as a cue to deceit

...