Readability and quality of wikipedia pages on neurosurgical topics

@article{Modiri2018ReadabilityAQ,
  title={Readability and quality of wikipedia pages on neurosurgical topics},
  author={Omeed Modiri and Daipayan Guha and Naif M Alotaibi and George M. Ibrahim and Nir Lipsman and Aria Fallah},
  journal={Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery},
  year={2018},
  volume={166},
  pages={66-70}
}
OBJECTIVES Wikipedia is the largest online encyclopedia with over 40 million articles, and generating 500 million visits per month. The aim of this study is to assess the readability and quality of Wikipedia pages on neurosurgical related topics. PATIENTS AND METHODS We selected the neurosurgical related Wikipedia pages based on the series of online patient information articles that are published by the American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS). We assessed readability of Wikipedia… Expand
Readability of English Wikipedia's health information over time
Objective: To assess and compare the readability of the twenty-five most accessed English medical articles on Wikipedia 0, 1, 5 and 10 years ago. Design: The twenty-five most accessed WikipediaExpand
Readability and quality of Wikipedia articles on pelvic floor disorders
TLDR
Wikipedia articles on PFD are neither readable nor reliable: they require a 12th-grade-level education for comprehension and are merely rated moderate in quality; in comparison, IUGA leaflets require a third-grade education for comprehending and are rated good in quality. Expand
Wikipedia in Vascular Surgery Medical Education: Comparative Study
TLDR
Based on this comparison, the authors of this study recommend the use of vascular surgery textbooks as a primary source of learning material because the information within is more consistent in quality and has fewer errors of omission. Expand
Integrating Wikipedia Articles and Images into an Information Resource for Radiology Patients
TLDR
This work sought to determine the extent to which concepts from a large online radiology glossary developed as part of the Patient-Oriented Radiology Reporter (PORTER) initiative could be mapped to relevant Wikipedia web pages and images using automated or semi-automated approaches. Expand
Assessing the quality of health-related Wikipedia articles with generic and specific metrics
TLDR
It is concluded that it is possible to combine generic and specific metrics to determine health-related content’s information quality and these metrics are computed automatically and can be used by curators to identify quality issues. Expand
Readability Metrics of Provider Post-Operative Handouts in Urology.
TLDR
It is hypothesized that the majority of provider handouts exceed the National Institutes of Health recommendation of writing at a sixth-grade reading level, and it is important to assess patient satisfaction with handouts and to correlate the complexity of post-operative handouts with outcome, such as unplanned phone calls and unscheduled visits. Expand
Situating Wikipedia as a health information resource in various contexts: A scoping review
TLDR
A comprehensive review of peer-reviewed, published literature to learn what the existing body of literature says about Wikipedia as a health information resource and what publication trends exist, if any. Expand
Pharmacy students can improve access to quality medicines information by editing Wikipedia articles
TLDR
Engaging pharmacy students in a Wikipedia editing assignment is a feasible alternative to writing drug monographs as a classroom assignment and effective in improving publicly available information on one of the most heavily accessed websites globally. Expand
Patient Education in Neurosurgery: Part 1 of A Systematic Review.
TLDR
The findings may guide neurosurgeons, departments, and professional associations in improving communication with patients, as current in-clinic discussions and education materials exhibit shortcomings, promoting poor comprehension. Expand
A new frontier: developing an undergraduate assessment task aimed at improving the representation of biomedical scientific information on Wikipedia
ABSTRACT The representation of scientific knowledge and information on Wikipedia is controversial. While some entries present established scientific fact, other entries are devoid of information orExpand
...
1
2
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 16 REFERENCES
Accuracy and readability of cardiovascular entries on Wikipedia: are they reliable learning resources for medical students?
TLDR
The Wikipedia entries are not aimed at a medical audience and should not be used as a substitute to recommended medical resources, and course designers and students should be aware that Wikipedia entries on cardiovascular diseases lack accuracy. Expand
Readability of Wikipedia Pages on Autoimmune Disorders: Systematic Quantitative Assessment
TLDR
Wikipedia pages related to autoimmune disorders are characterized by a low level of readability, and the onus is on physicians and health authorities to create, together with patients themselves, disease-specific readable sites, disseminating highly accessible health-related online information in terms of both clarity and conciseness. Expand
The readability of the English Wikipedia article on Parkinson’s disease
TLDR
The reading difficulty level of the English Wikipedia article on PD was evaluated using quantitative readability-assessment scales to assess patients’ abilities to understand health information, follow medical instructions, take drugs correctly, and learn about disease prevention. Expand
Assessing Readability and Reliability of Online Patient Information Regarding Vestibular Schwannoma.
TLDR
Although there are a wide range of different websites easily available to patients on their condition and its treatment options, the information is written at a difficult level which may exceed the understanding level of many patients as it iswritten at a higher than average level of expected reading ability. Expand
The Readability of AAOS Patient Education Materials: Evaluating the Progress Since 2008.
TLDR
Although the mean Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level was lower in the present study than it was in 2008, a need remains to improve the readability of AAOS patient education articles. Expand
A comparative analysis of neurosurgical online education materials to assess patient comprehension
TLDR
All neurosurgical subspecialty education material provided on the American Association of Neurological Surgeons website was uniformly written at a level that was too high, as assessed by all modalities. Expand
Web 2.0 Applications in Medicine: Trends and Topics in the Literature
  • C. Boudry
  • Computer Science, Medicine
  • Medicine 2.0
  • 2015
TLDR
This bibliometric analysis shows that the biomedical community is engaged in the use of Web 2.0 applications and confirms its high level of interest in these tools, indicating the successful integration of Web2.0 into the biomedical field. Expand
Wikipedia: A Key Tool for Global Public Health Promotion
TLDR
The intricacies, strengths, and weaknesses of Wikipedia as a source of health information are discussed and it is compared with other medical wikis. Expand
Readability of pediatric biomedical research informed consent forms.
TLDR
Readability analyses were conducted on a large sample of pediatric biomedical informed consent forms obtained during a 10-year period from a large midwestern children's hospital, finding that the purpose of the informed consent form is being compromised, in part, by a readability factor. Expand
Learning to DISCERN online: applying an appraisal tool to health websites in a workshop setting.
TLDR
It is possible that general schemes such as DISCERN will provide users with simple and flexible skills for dealing with the wide range of treatment information available, and may help users discriminate between high- and low-quality online treatment information. Expand
...
1
2
...