Rationalizing meat consumption. The 4Ns

  title={Rationalizing meat consumption. The 4Ns},
  author={Jared Piazza and Matthew B. Ruby and Steve Loughnan and Mischel Luong and Juliana Kulik and Hanne M. Watkins and Mirra Seigerman},

Figures and Tables from this paper

Meat reduction, vegetarianism, or chicken avoidance: US omnivores’ impressions of three meat-restricted diets
Meat consumption has a variety of implications in society. While various types of meat-restricted diets exist to address this, not enough is known about how the average meat consumer views different
The Psychology of Meat Consumption
This chapter starts with a brief outline of the historic development of the interspecies relationships and discusses the role of norms in changing behavior, and possible ways of employing community-based social marketing are offered.
Why environmentalists eat meat
This work interviews environmentally-minded researchers asking them why they eat meat, and suggests that policies and messages that try to educate or guilt meat-eaters are unlikely to work with those well aware of the impacts of their actions.
The ‘me’ in meat: Does affirming the self make eating animals seem more morally wrong?
Motivated Moral Outrage Among Meat-Eaters
Many meat-eaters experience cognitive dissonance when aware that their eating behaviors contradict their moral values, such as desires to protect the environment or animals from harm. One way in
A structured literature review of the meat paradox
Many people wish to avoid harming animals, yet most people also consume meat. This theoretical ‘meat paradox’ is a form of cognitive dissonance and has grave negative consequences for animal welfare
Consumer Moral Dilemma in the Choice of Animal-Friendly Meat Products
More and more consumers, at least in Western developed countries, are attentive to the sustainability aspects of their food, one of which concerns animal welfare. The conflict of harming an animal
Motivations and Constraints of Meat Avoidance
Reducing the consumption of meat can make a significant contribution to sustainable development. However, at least in Western societies with their already rather high levels of per-capita meat
Chewing Over In Vitro Meat: Animal Ethics, Cannibalism and Social Progress
It is suggested that animal ethicists and vegans should be willing to cautiously embrace the production of in vitro flesh, and the position that cannibalism simpliciter is not morally problematic, though a great many practices typically associated with it are.


Real men don’t eat (vegetable) quiche: Masculinity and the justification of meat consumption.
As arguments become more pronounced that meat consumption harms the environment, public health, and animals, meat eaters should experience increased pressure to justify their behavior. Results of a
Eating Death
Abstract Vegetarianism has long been associated in popular imagination with pacifism and nonviolence due to the prevalence of ethical motives underlying it. If this is so ethically motivated
The Psychology of Eating Animals
Most people both eat animals and care about animals. Research has begun to examine the psychological processes that allow people to negotiate this “meat paradox.” To understand the psychology of
Values and Beliefs of Vegetarians and Omnivores
Compared with the full range of vegetarians and omnivores on right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, human values, and consumption values, the finding suggests that individuals consume meat and embrace its symbolism in ways consistent with their self-definitions.
Moralization and Becoming a Vegetarian: The Transformation of Preferences Into Values and the Recruitment of Disgust
We describe a rather common process that we call moralization, in which objects or activities that were previously morally neutral acquire a moral component. Moralization converts preferences into
Ambivalence towards meat
Meat, morals, and masculinity
The role of meat consumption in the denial of moral status and mind to meat animals