Rational Ignorance at the Patent Office

  title={Rational Ignorance at the Patent Office},
  author={Mark A. Lemley},
  journal={Northwestern University Law Review},
  • Mark A. Lemley
  • Published 2001
  • Economics, Geology
  • Northwestern University Law Review
It is common to assert that the Patent and Trademark Office does a bad job of examining patents, and that it should spend more time and money weeding out bad patents. In this article, Professor Lemley challenges that conventional wisdom. Using available data regarding the cost and incidence of patent prosecution, litigation, licensing and other uses of patents, he demonstrates that strengthening the examination process is not cost effective. The core insight is that very few patents are… Expand
431 Citations
Why Weak Patents? Rational Ignorance or Pro-'Customer' Tilt?
Private Profits and Public Benefits - How not to Reform the Patent System
In Defense of the Patent Friendly Court Hypothesis: Theory and Evidence
Patent Infringement, Litigation, and Settlement
Patent office in innovation policy: Nobody's perfect