Rational Choice Theory and the Paradox of Not Voting

@article{Feddersen2004RationalCT,
  title={Rational Choice Theory and the Paradox of Not Voting},
  author={Timothy Feddersen},
  journal={Journal of Economic Perspectives},
  year={2004},
  volume={18},
  pages={99-112}
}
  • T. Feddersen
  • Published 1 February 2004
  • Economics
  • Journal of Economic Perspectives
At least since Downs’s (1957) seminal work An Economic Theory of Democracy, rational choice theorists have appreciated the “paradox of not voting.” In a large election, the probability that an individual vote might change the election outcome is vanishingly small. If each person only votes for the purpose of influencing the election outcome, then even a small cost to vote—like a minor schedule conflict or mildly bad weather—should dissuade anyone from voting. Yet it seems that many people will… 
Altruism and the Decision to Vote
A core problem at the foundation of rational-actor models for politics is the seeming irrationality of voting, i.e. that it is irrational for voters to vote and to be informed about politics. Myerson
Voter Turnout Altruism and the Decision to Vote: Explaining and Testing High
A core problem at the foundation of rational-actor models for politics is the seeming irrationality of voting, i.e. that it is irrational for voters to vote and to be informed about politics. Myerson
Information Acquisition and Voting Mechanisms: Theory and Evidence
Would rational voters engage in costly participation or invest in costly information? Rational choice models of voting predict that voter turnout becomes arbitrarily close to zero in large elections
ESSAYS ON STRATEGIC VOTING
This dissertation investigates strategic voting from two perspectives. The second chapter studies a theory of electoral competition in the presence of strategic forward-looking voters while the third
The paradox of information and voter turnout
Abstract The most prominent explanation for the paradox of voter turnout is that citizens are willing to bear the cost of voting because they perceive a benefit (e.g., fulfilling a civic duty or
Smooth Politicians and Paternalistic Voters: A Theory of Large Elections
We propose a new game theoretic approach to modeling large elections that overcomes the "paradox of voting" in a costly voting framework, without reliance on the assumption of ad hoc preferences for
Voting Behavior and Political Institutions: An Overview of Challenging Questions in Theory and Experimental Research
Voting and committee decisions can be considered the two core elements of the democratic political process. By voting, the members of a constituency determine whom they entrust as representatives
Electoral Participation and Communicative Voting in Europe
On the Representativeness of Voter Turnout
Prominent theory research on voting uses models in which expected pivotality drives voters’ turnout decisions and hence determines voting outcomes. It is recognized, however, that such work is at
Essays on strategic voting and political influence
Chapter 1 : I attempt a detailed literature review on the passage from the probabilistic versions of the Condorcet Jury Theorem to models augmented by the concept of strategic agents, including both
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 49 REFERENCES
The paradox of voting and candidate competition: A general equilibrium analysis
Conventional analysis of the decision of expected utility maximizing agents to vote has concluded that it is irrational to vote unless voters have a distorted view of their individual impact or place
Rational Choice and Turnout
Turning out to vote is the most common and important act of political participation in any democracy. Voting is also less well understood and explained empirically than other political acts engaged
A Theory of the Calculus of Voting
Much recent theorizing about the utility of voting concludes that voting is an irrational act in that it usually costs more to vote than one can expect to get in return.1 This conclusion is doubtless
To Vote or Not to Vote: The Merits and Limits of Rational Choice Theory
  • A. Blais
  • Economics, Political Science
  • 2000
What makes people vote? In addressing this simple question, Andre Blais examines the factors that increase or decrease turnout at the aggregate, cross-national level and considers what affects
Follow The Leader: Theory And Evidence On Political Participation
This paper presents an empirical and theoretical investigation of the strategic components to political participation. Using state-by-state voting data for the eleven U.S. Presidential elections,
Rational Turnout: The Neglected Role of Groups
Rational choice theories have difficulty accounting for individual participation in collective action. Voting is among the acts hardest to explain; consumption benefits have been proposed to account
Economic Discontent and Political Behavior: The Role of Personal Grievances and Collective Economic Judgments in Congressional Voting
It is widely assumed that political action is motivated most powerfully by issues that impinge immediately and tangibly upon private life. For example, this assumption pervades the aggregate research
“Sophisticated” Voting in the 1988 Presidential Primaries
Voters in multicandidate contests may confront circumstances under which it is in their interest to vote for a second- or even lower-ranked candidate. The U.S. electoral system, typically offering a
A strategic calculus of voting
ConclusionThere are several major insights which this game theoretic analysis has produced. First, we have shown that equilibria exist with substantial turnout even when both the majority is much
Groups in Rational Turnout Models
A model of the strategic calculus of voting that incorporates the behavior of groups is presented. If candidates choose different positions, positive turnout is possible in (partial) equilibrium and
...
...