Corpus ID: 18357439

Rate of Adaptive Evolution under Blending Inheritance

@article{Rogers2015RateOA,
  title={Rate of Adaptive Evolution under Blending Inheritance},
  author={Alan R. Rogers},
  journal={arXiv: Populations and Evolution},
  year={2015}
}
  • A. Rogers
  • Published 1 April 2015
  • Mathematics, Biology
  • arXiv: Populations and Evolution
AbstractIn a population of size N, adaptive evolution is 2N times faster under Mendelian inheritancethan under the 19th-century theory of blending inheritance. Unfortunately we have no means of de-termining, according to the standardof years, how long a period it takes tomodify a species.Charles Darwin [2, p. 270]In the latter half of the 19th century, evo-lutionary time seemed limited. Victorian sci-ence suggested that the earth was not mucholder than 100 million years [12, 13, 8]. Wasit… Expand

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 19 REFERENCES
The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection
PROBABLY most geneticists to-day are some-what sceptical as to the value of the mathematical treatment of their problems. With the deepest respect, and even awe, for that association of complexExpand
On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life
TLDR
A man is unworthy of the name of a man of science who, whatever may be his special branch of study, has not materially altered his views on some important points within the last twelve years. Expand
Natural Inheritance
IT is related that, when some boastful patriot was once describing the trees in his country as so high that a man could hardly see their tops, a stranger retorted “That is nothing to the trees in myExpand
Fisher the evolutionary biologist
Summary. Fisher’s pioneering work in linking Darwinism and Mendelism is now built into biology, but the result that he viewed as holding the ‘supreme position in biology’, the fundamental theorem ofExpand
Did Jenkin's swamping argument invalidate Darwin's theory of natural selection?
Fleeming Jenkin's swamping argument (1867) is re-examined in relation to subsequent criticisms of its assumptions. Jenkin's original argument purported to show that, under blending inheritance,Expand
A Mathematical Theory of Natural and Artificial Selection, Part V: Selection and Mutation
TLDR
This work shall first consider initial conditions, when only a few of the new type exist as the result of a single mutation; and then the course of events in a population where the new factor is present in such numbers as to be in no danger of extinction by mere bad luck. Expand
Fleeming Jenkin and the origin of species: a reassessment
Early in June of 1867, Charles Darwin turned back the cover of his copy of the respected quarterly North British Review , to find on its opening pages a lengthy essay attacking his theory of naturalExpand
John Joly (1857–1933) and his determinations of the age of the Earth
Abstract John Joly (1857–1933) was one of Ireland’s most eminent scientists of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries who made important discoveries in physics, geology and photography. HeExpand
Fisher's fundamental theorem of natural selection.
TLDR
What Fisher really meant can be illustrated by looking in a new way at a recent model for the evolution of clutch size, which explains why Fisher was misunderstood. Expand
What was Fisher's fundamental theorem of natural selection and what was it for?
  • A. Plutynski
  • Medicine
  • Studies in history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences
  • 2006
TLDR
This paper explicates the theorem, examines the role that it played in Fisher's general project for biology, and analyzes why it was so very fundamental for Fisher. Expand
...
1
2
...