• DOI:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1994.tb00448.x
• Corpus ID: 144252325

Rape Myths

@article{Lonsway1994RapeM,
  title={Rape Myths},
  author={Kimberly A. Lonsway and Louise F. Fitzgerald},
  journal={Psychology of Women Quarterly},
  year={1994},
  volume={18},
  pages={133 - 164}
}

• K. Lonsway, L. Fitzgerald
• Published 1 June 1994
• Psychology
• Psychology of Women Quarterly

Theories of sexual aggression and victimization have increasingly emphasized the role of rape myths in the perpetuation of sexual assault. Rape myths are attitudes and generally false beliefs about rape that are widely and persistently held, and that serve to deny and justify male sexual aggression against women. Acceptance of such myths has been assessed with a number of measures, and investigators have examined its relationship with numerous variables and interventions. Although there has been extensive research in this area, definitions, terminology, and measures of rape myth acceptance (RMA) continue to lack adequate theoretical and psychometric precision. Despite such criticisms, we emphasize that the significance of this type of research cannot be overstated because it has immense potential for the understanding of sexual assault. The present article offers a theory-based definition of rape myths, reviews and critiques the literature on rape myth acceptance, and suggests directions for future research. In particular we argue that such work must include the development and application of improved measures, with more concern for the theoretical and methodological issues unique to this field.