Ranks and rivals: a theory of competition.

Abstract

Social comparison theories typically imply a comparable degree of competition between commensurate rivals who are competing on a mutually important dimension. However, the present analysis reveals that the degree of competition between such rivals depends on their proximity to a meaningful standard. Studies 1 to 3 test the prediction that individuals become more competitive and less willing to maximize profitable joint gains when they and their commensurate rivals are highly ranked (e.g., #2 vs. #3) than when they are not (e.g., #202 vs. #203). Studies 4 to 6 then generalize these findings, showing that the degree of competition also increases in the proximity of other meaningful standards, such as the bottom of a ranking scale or a qualitative threshold in the middle of a scale. Studies 7 and 8 further examine the psychological processes underlying this phenomenon and reveal that proximity to a standard exerts a direct impact on the basic unidirectional drive upward, beyond the established effects of commensurability and dimension relevance.

4 Figures and Tables

Statistics

0510'06'07'08'09'10'11'12'13'14'15'16'17
Citations per Year

62 Citations

Semantic Scholar estimates that this publication has 62 citations based on the available data.

See our FAQ for additional information.

Cite this paper

@article{Garcia2006RanksAR, title={Ranks and rivals: a theory of competition.}, author={Stephen M. Garcia and Avishalom Tor and Richard D. Gonzalez}, journal={Personality & social psychology bulletin}, year={2006}, volume={32 7}, pages={970-82} }