Ranking Departments: A Comparison of Alternative Approaches

@article{Masuoka2007RankingDA,
  title={Ranking Departments: A Comparison of Alternative Approaches},
  author={Natalie Masuoka and Bernard N. Grofman and Scott L. Feld},
  journal={PS: Political Science \& Politics},
  year={2007},
  volume={40},
  pages={531 - 537}
}
There are many different ways to develop rankings of Ph.D.-granting academic departments. Perhaps the most common method is reputational: we simply ask knowledgeable scholars in the discipline to provide their rankings and aggregate these in some fashion. Other ways involve more “objective indicators.” But, of course, departments have multiple attributes, e.g., we might be interested in how good a department is as a place to get a Ph.D., or we might be interested simply in the research record… 

Publishing in Public Administration: Issues with Defining, Comparing, and Ranking the Output of Universities

ABSTRACT The measurement and comparison of the public administration output of universities is an important means for mapping the state of the field. However, such exercises are very sensitive to

Publishing in Public Administration: Issues with Defining, Comparing and Ranking the Output of Universities

ABSTRACTThe measurement and comparison of the public administration output of universities is an important means for mapping the state of the field. However, such exercises are very sensitive to

Scholarly Productivity in Non-Ph.D. Departments

Abstract Political scientists hail from large, research-intensive universities like the Ohio State University, regional comprehensive schools like Western Kentucky University, and small

Research Career Paths Among Political Scientists in Teaching Institutions

  • K. Hill
  • Sociology
    PS: Political Science & Politics
  • 2021
ABSTRACT Considerable work assesses research productivity in political science. Yet, the latter work has not explicated how research careers can differ across time and individuals and neither has it

What is the Canon in American Politics? Analyses of Core Graduate Syllabi

ABSTRACT Many core graduate-level seminars claim to expose students to their discipline’s “canon.” The contents of this canon, however, can and do differ across departments and instructors. This

Training the Next Generation of Teaching Professors: A Comparative Study of Ph.D. Programs in Political Science

Abstract In this article, we investigate the graduate curricula of political science programs and 122 Ph.D.-granting political science programs in the United States and how they seek to prepare

Development and Outcomes of a New Institutional Ranking System for Public Administration Research and Scholarship

The focus of the chapter will be two-fold: concentration on input and outcomes of an international, institutional ranking for scholarship and research. After a review of the literature, the first

Research Career Paths Among Political Scientists in Research Institutions

  • K. Hill
  • Business
    PS: Political Science & Politics
  • 2021
ABSTRACT Considerable research assesses research success in political science. Yet this work has not considered widespread findings that scholars can follow various career research paths that

Determinants of Political Science Faculty Salaries at the University of California

  • B. Grofman
  • Education
    PS: Political Science & Politics
  • 2009
Combining salary data for permanent non-emeritus faculty at seven departments of political science within the University of California system with lifetime citation counts and other individual-level

Gender Representation in the American Politics Canon: An Analysis of Core Graduate Syllabi

ABSTRACT Core graduate-level seminars, in many ways, establish the “canon” literature for scholars entering a discipline. In the study of American Politics, the contents of this canon vary widely

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 31 REFERENCES

Ranking Doctoral Programs by Placement: A New Method

While many bemoan the increasingly large role rankings play in American higher education, their prominence and importance are indisputable. Such rankings have many different audiences, ranging from

The Political Science 400: Citations by Ph.D. Cohort and by Ph.D.-Granting Institution *

tages and disadvantages. Reputation, as judged by survey data, comes closest to tapping our commonsense understanding of "who's who" in the discipline. Reputational surveys of departments conducted

Department Rankings: An Alternative Approach

s International, American Doctoral Dissertations and Masters Abstracts International. Dissertations from 1861 to present are in the database. 7. The authors on whom we were unable to locate

Graduate Training, Current Affiliation and Publishing Books in Political Science

Scores of studies have measured the quality of political science departments. Generally speaking, these studies have taken two forms. Many have relied on scholars' survey responses to construct

Graduate Training and Research Productivity in the 1990s: A Look at Who Publishes

The relationship between reputational rankings of political science departments and their scholarly productivity remains a source of discussion and controversy. After the National Research Council

Ranking Political Science Programs: A View from the Lower Half

In an age of diminished resources for higher education, the ranking of programs takes on special significance, particularly for programs that rate poorly in the eyes of their peers. Before

The Good, the Better, and the Best in Political Science

There is no rhadamanthine solution to the problem of comparing the research performance of departments, and there is no shortage of interest in the topic. Institutionally, a favorable ranking

Political Science Departments: Reputations Versus Productivity

This brief essay is written in an attempt to provide a comparison of the reputed quality of political science departments with measures of their productivity. The first study done in the last two

A Rising Tide Lifts All Boats: Political Science Department Reputation and the Reputation of the University

The publication of the latest rating of doctoral programs by the National Research Council (NRC 1995) has sparked great interest among university faculties. For some, the results vindicated years of

Ranking the Graduate Departments in the 1980s: Toward Objective Qualitative Indicators

This essay is based on several technical works, including Steven J. Brams, Superpower Games: Applying Game Theory to Superpower Conflict (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1985) and Brams and Marek